Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation


"YBM" <ybmess@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42d1946d$0$12926$636a15ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Androcles a écrit :
>> "YBM" <ybmess@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:42d16eed$0$12778$636a15ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>Androcles a écrit :
>>>
>>>>Of course I haven't, there is no t = -1.
>>>
>>>As well as there is no word spelled "y e s
>>>t e r d a y" in english ?
>>
>>
>> Go back to yesterday then,
>
> So there is or there is not a "yesterday" ?

There used to be one, but it is over.

>
> How could you confuse the trivial fact of
> talking about events taking place before
> an arbitrary origin of a clock and traveling
> to the past ?

How can you confuse an event in the past with a vector?


It is even worse than confusing
> closing velocity and relative velocity (what you
> do for years).

What's the difference, peanut brain?
Androcles.



.

Relevant Pages
Loading