Re: Electo London Gravity ?


"Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1121105795.2849.1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
snip
> | > |
> | > | OK... If you say so. I'd much rather call it force unless we can
> | > | can quantify time and displacement.
> | > |
> |
> |
> | <How do you quantify force except by time and displacment ?>
> | It is a good question. I am sure at some subatomic level you can
> | quantify the force between your bum and your chair in those terms
> | but a cushion maker might not appreciate that kind of data in helping
> | you select a soft meduim or firm cushion.
>
> Well he should unless he's after a snow job because as far as I know good
> expanded foam has compressibility data.
Results 1 - 10 of about 17,800 for "compressibility data" newtons. (0.24 seconds
Results 1 - 10 of about 55 for "compressibility data" acceleration. (0.28 seconds)
LOL A contrarian Eh?
>
> |
> | Let's call it instinct... or copying what others do. The workers actually
> | producing some meaningful calculations are in chemistry and biosciences.
> |
> | Most of the data we are reading is not in terms of acceleration and I
> don't
> | see what we gain converting it. AFAIK all of the moving mass is in
> | orbits predetermined orbits where we can't alter it anyway.
>
> We work from mass and inertial data to determine acceleration that is
> keeping mass in orbit ?
Is gravity what keeps electrons in orbit?
>
> |
> | Dubya likes democracy. So let's do democracy
> | Results 1 - 10 of about 14 for "london acceleration". (0.26 seconds)
> | Results 1 - 10 of about 912 for "london force". (0.20 seconds)
> |
> | ...Look's your party need to hire a few more slimey lobbyists
> | and political consultants. :o)
>
> What units does your force come in ?
Newtons
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Newton.html
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Force.html

> | > | > snip
> | > | > | Decode the holy grail first.
> | > | > |
> | > | > | (1-(1/(1/3))^2)/(1 + (1/(1/3))^2) = - 0.08 = FTL ? -p<+p or
> | > | > | > (m*-v)<(m*+v) or (m*-c^2)<(m*+c^2) =g?
> | > | >
> | > | > The first bit is the product of the reaction of an accelerating mass
> and
> | > by
> | > | > recursion equalling FTL?
> | > | Big deal! I am moving FTL right now wrt one of the particles at fnal.
> | > | If I was a bit closer to one of those particles, Coulombly speaking,
> | > | it would be a big big deal.
> | >
> | > Great it was just a remaining point from a SR gung ho were the point was
> no
> | > FTL so I arithmaticed it out of their math {:-)
> | > Just seems to give loads of possibilities if you don't put your mind in
> that
> | > rat trap.
> | >
> | > | Don't cry. I understand. That mean old Maxwell made you do that
> | > | didn't he. He thinks simply accelerating particles makes 'em radiate.
> | > | I guess it never occured to him what kind of gloves he was gonna
> | > | wear before he took a firm grasp on a particle to accelerate it. ;-)
> | >
> | > No I was fighting with an SRist at the time, FTL had never been a hang
> up of
> | > mine {:-) Who's Maxwell {:-)
> | Maxwell was Weber's understudy. Doncha know nuttin ? :o)
> |
>
> Reading Weber, Reading Weber, study, study, study, forgotten it all start
> again, Reading Weber.....{:-) can I go to the loo miss ?
Don't *ask* 'cause I am all out of rolling eye pics.
>
LOL I don't know that *through* reading is so important.
You do, of course, have to be convinced that relativistic
field equations don't necessary depend on AE's funny clocks.

Sue...


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Electo London Gravity ?
    ... > | snip ... > | orbits predetermined orbits where we can't alter it anyway. ... > We work from mass and inertial data to determine acceleration that is ... > Reading Weber, Reading Weber, study, study, study, forgotten it all start ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: OT: This Bumper Sticker Enrages Fascists
    ... It's funny, though, in that history has always been filtered through glasses. ... Evidently you find popular political commentators and the mass media a better source of factual and pertinent information than the scholarship of learned men and women. ... It is only by reading *everything* available that a proper perspective can be attained and well-considered judgment may be formed. ...
    (alt.smokers.pipes)
  • Re: Scientific Errors
    ... What happens with neutral particles? ... I was hoping I could avoid reading it and rely upon your review of it :-) ... mass in relativistic motion is tied up in the EM field (this bit is now ... against BB/Inflation type theories of cosmology. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Scientific Errors
    ... What happens with neutral particles? ... I was hoping I could avoid reading it and rely upon your review of it ... mass in relativistic motion is tied up in the EM field (this bit is now ... against BB/Inflation type theories of cosmology. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Photon vs Wave emissions from antennas?
    ... Tom opines about my reading, but it is about the writing from the good ... "For a particle with no mass, ... This works for a photon." ...
    (rec.radio.amateur.antenna)