Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:21:02 GMT
"EL" <hemetis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1121132195.274080.277570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [EL]
> Oh my!
> You have lost your brain, poor thing.
Pathetic flamer.
Androcles.
>
>
> Androcles wrote:
>> "EL" <hemetis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1121058272.076597.292030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > [YBM wrote]
>> >> You're right. Any other coordinate but t=0 shouldn't
>> >> be PHYSICALLY consistent. Androcles' "argument" works
>> >> the same for t>O as it "works" for t<0.
>> >>
>> >> Unfortunately, with morons like Androcles and Wilson,
>> >> even using their own arguments on trivial facts does not
>> >> make them to think (it is far too late).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Right. But I didn't say "exist", but "has a meaning".
>> > [EL]
>> > Dear YBM,
>> > As I read you, you seam to be a rare relativist who knows what he
>> > is
>> > talking about.
>> > Indeed there are negative time intervals because measuring a time
>> > interval from today to seven days ago implies minus seven days from
>> > today.
>> > Please allow me to openly put you to the test, because I am under
>> > the
>> > impression that relativists have pathologically altered minds, and
>> > no
>> > offence is meant here, only science.
>> > ****
>> > The test: If you received one newspaper every day in the last seven
>> > days, please use equations to answer:
>> > 1- What is the frequency of newspaper delivery during dt = -7days?
>> > 2- What is the time interval assigned for each delivery during the
>> > dt
>> > = -7days?
>> > ****
>> > I think that by answering those two simple questions we can clear
>> > up
>> > many things and avoid a lot of misunderstanding.
>> >
>> > Kind regards.
>> > EL
>> Dear EL,
>>
>> As I read you, you seam [stet] to be a common bozo who who has no
>> idea
>> what he is talking about.
>>
>> Indeed there are no negative time intervals anymoe than there are
>> negative apples or negatove oranges, because measuring an apple
>> interval
>> from a tree to the ground implies minus seven apples from the tree,
>> and
>> trees are not apples.
>>
>>
>> Please allow me to openly put you to the test, because I am under the
>> impression that bozos have pathologically altered minds, and no
>> offence
>> is meant here, only mathematics.
>> Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_space
>>
>> 1.. V is a commutative group under addition of vectors
>> 1.. There exists an additive identity element 0 in V, such that
>> for
>> all elements v in V, v + 0 = v.
>> 2.. For all v in V, there exists an element w in V, such that v +
>> w
>> = 0.
>> 3.. Vector addition is associative: u + (v + w) = (u + v) + w.
>> 4.. Vector addition is commutative: v + w = w + v.
>> 2.. Scalar multiplication is associative: a(b v) = (ab)v.
>> 3.. 1 v = v, where 1 denotes the multiplicative identity in F.
>> 4.. Scalar multiplication distributes over vector addition: a(v +
>> w) =
>> a v + a w.
>> 5.. Scalar multiplication distributes over scalar addition: (a +
>> b)v =
>> a v + b v.
>> ****
>> The test: If you received one apple every orange in the last seven
>> oranges, please use equations to answer:
>> 1- What is the frequency of apple delivery during d(orange) = -7
>> oranges?
>> 2- What is the apple interval assigned for each delivery during the
>> d(orange) = -7 oranges?
>> I think that by answering those two simple questions we can clear up
>> many things and avoid a lot of misunderstanding.
>>
>> Kind regards.
>> Androcles.
>> PS. Oranges are not vectors either.
>
.
- References:
- Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: john_doe_ph_d
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: YBM
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: YBM
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: YBM
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: EL
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: EL
- Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Next by Date: An educational road to QED?
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Next by thread: Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
