Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation


"YBM" <ybmess@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42d7b9e2$0$18726$626a14ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Androcles a écrit :
| > "Terminology" my arse, the speed of light is represent
by c,
| > not w.
|
| You are confused as long as more than two letters are in
use
| in a bunch of algebra, aren't you ?


You are confuse as long as more than ONE letter is used in
algebra,
aren't you? Two is way out of your reach.


|
| > I want to know why Einstein didn't use (c+v)/(1+v/c)
instead
| > of c+v
| > when he derived the Lorentz transforms. ONCE AGAIN!!
|
| How many times should the same perfectly clear and simple
answer
| be given for you to understand ?
|
| c +/- v has to be used because it is *not* the speed of
light
| as measured in the k frame,


Ok, bozo, what IS the speed of light as measured in the
k-frame?
c, right?
One more letter will *** you right up.
[snip]
Androcles


.

Quantcast