Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: YBM <ybmess@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 18:45:39 +0200
Androcles a écrit :
"YBM" <ybmess@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:42d85406$0$4947$626a14ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Androcles a écrit :
| > "It follows, further, that the velocity of light c cannot be
| > altered by
| > composition with a velocity less than that of light. For
| > this case we obtain
| >
| > Then the velocity of light c CAN be altered by
| > composition with a velocity less than that of light.
|
| It is not composition since it is not the velocity of light
| as measured in the k frame.
[snip anger to have been caught as a hypocrite]
So ? Why don't you admit, as you'd do if you were honest, that you have been proven wrong on a quite elementary issue ?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- References:
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: YBM
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Prev by Date: Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
- Next by Date: Re: GR ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Next by thread: Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|