Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox



Esaelp wrote:
> "In the transverse axis there is no
relativistic shortening of the lever arm and the moment applied to the
transverse arm, as observed in reference frame B is equal to the
transverse
force multiplied by the Lorentz Transformation for Transverse Force and
it
would seem that, for the lever not to rotate in either reference frame,
the
Lorentz Transformation for Transverse Force would have to be
(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5 "
>
Although there would be no shortening of the transverse axis, would
not there still be a relativistic "thinning", by the same factor as the
parallel axis? And thereby maintaining an equilibrium of the forces?
In other words, does not the entire lever contract in the direction of
motion equally?

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Transverse versus parallel torques -- did I miss something here?
    ... the one observing the lever going by. ... Your concern of longitudinal mass and transverse mass is of no concern. ... Transverse versus parallel torques -- did I miss something ... But its mass, as measured by S, is gamma times ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Contradictions?
    ... with endpoints coinciding along the transverse ... transverse separation between them). ... taking into consideration the Lorentz transverse force transformation. ... Nice contradiction. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Contradictions?
    ... L (the length of the wires) is much greater than a (the ... transverse separation between them). ... taking into consideration the Lorentz transverse force transformation.. ... I can rotate my frame of reference and take any axis that suits me. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)