Re: GR ?
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Jul 2005 13:59:40 -0700
Significant Zero wrote:
> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:ImDDe.1901$fx4.1574@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
snip
>
> Yes as a physical fact.
>
> | Similarly in
> | SR, the PROJECTION of a rod's length, and the PROJECTION of a clock's
> | tick-interval, depend on their orientation relative to the measuring
> | apparatus. This is, of course, orientation in spaceTIME.
>
> This is not a physical fact its a observational or mathematically engineered
> one and has no comparison or effect on the ladder or the doorway or rod and
> clock.
> You appear to be mixing physical facts with observational and or
> mathematical ones and then forgetting which is which.
This is a necessary procedure if you want a light-clock
to change it's rate on command of your gaze.
Spoonbending 101... or is that another class you were
thrown out of? :o)
Sue...
snip
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- References:
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- Prev by Date: Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
- Next by Date: Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
- Previous by thread: Re: GR ?
- Next by thread: Re: GR ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|