Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?



Bilge wrote:
> Ken S. Tucker:
> >
> >
> >Bilge wrote:
> >[...]
> >
> >> As far as I'm concerned, the concept of OWLS is meaningless until
> >> someone manages to come up with a physical meaning that makes sense.
> >
> >Doppler Shift, Aberration, see Special Relativity
> >for details ,<shrug>.
>
> If you believe that, supply the details. If you can't supply the details,
> shut up.

*** off.

Sodium (Na) D line, the knowledge of it's shift only
needed v/c. "v" was known, hence "c" is computed.

More clearly is parallax related to aberration,
where dv is known and "c" can be calculated.

Many examples like that are available to show we
can find OWLS.

I do agree a radar system is clearer.
Ken S. Tucker

.

Quantcast