Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?



Bilge wrote:
> Ken S. Tucker:
> >
> >
> >Bilge wrote:
> >> Ken S. Tucker:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Bilge wrote:
> >> >[...]
> >> >
> >> >> As far as I'm concerned, the concept of OWLS is meaningless until
> >> >> someone manages to come up with a physical meaning that makes sense.
> >> >
> >> >Doppler Shift, Aberration, see Special Relativity
> >> >for details ,<shrug>.
> >>
> >> If you believe that, supply the details. If you can't supply the details,
> >> shut up.
> >
> >*** off.
> >
> >Sodium (Na) D line, the knowledge of it's shift only
> >needed v/c. "v" was known, hence "c" is computed.
>
> `c' is the speed of light. I didn't ask you to explain that. Stop
> changing the subject.


Mr. Potato Head, OWLS asks if the "c" can be
founds without TWLS, I indicated how. Hey
toss a flare watch the Na "D" Doppler shift.
Case closed.

bilge the X-janitor in some lab was fired because
he always spills the coffee the employees ask him
to get, oh well, certinly there's a group that deals
with the "bilge syndrome", before it spreads. Likely
it is contagious, so I'd avoid bilge.

((cuties))

Ken









>
> >
> >More clearly is parallax related to aberration,
> >where dv is known and "c" can be calculated.
> >
> >Many examples like that are available to show we
> >can find OWLS.
> >
> >I do agree a radar system is clearer.
> >Ken S. Tucker
> >

.

Quantcast