Re: the funny electron
- From: xxein@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 23 Jul 2005 18:25:14 -0700
Larry A wrote:
> when we still say that an atom has only one
> electron or whatever, it means that the electron,
> as an distinct described entity, is fooling around
> the nucleus in an so called electron cloud
>
> now, an incident sharp monochromic EM needs
> to be combined with the frequncy comming from the
> electron
>
> how fast is the electron rotating or whatever
xxein: This is what we do not know. Is an electron dipolar to make a
spin important? Is spin just a word that we use to convey some
association to other elementary particles?
In light of my previous post on this thread, we simply don't know.
Ah! Frequency. As if a singular electron had one for itself. We
don't know this. We don't know if it is just a field artifact wrt its
bound state. Is it an on-off frequency determined by its movement in a
sea of photons? Does it really have a physical spin that shows up as a
dipolar?
I personally believe that electrons are bound states of energy that are
spinning structures of photons. But because of photon exchange rate,
they exibit the field rather than a static structure (depending upon
how you measure them).
Photons, otoh, seem to be the 'normal' exchange rate of energy. But we
know that the 'quantum' is much less energetic than this. So we name
quarks as identifiable components of energy.
While we can identify transitional phases as such, we don't know why
(except for proclamation) these phases occur as stable transitions in
an hierarchical structure.
So we can't identify what causes a particular frequency to its
hierarchical cause nor its relation to a field frequency within the
transition state.
How often you may have to pee is not directly related to any of the
above. In the same fashion, we do not know the DIRECT physical
relationship of a measured frequency and its cause.
We posit theory with structure but we don't know that the structure
represents the actual reality.
We are in Oz and I make no bones about it, but I wish the nutty
professors would.
We just don't have the right belief system to realize reality on its
most fundamental level.
I wish you supreme logic.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: the funny electron
- From: xxein
- Re: the funny electron
- Prev by Date: Re: GR ?
- Next by Date: Re: womens and relativity
- Previous by thread: Re: the funny electron
- Next by thread: Re: the funny electron
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|