Re: womens and relativity
- From: "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jul 2005 00:45:07 -0700
J. Horta wrote:
> Still a valid spelling du-cha-bag. So you were wrong!!! hahahahahah
You're wrong for not understanding my last message. Validity has to do
with prescription, not description.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: J. Horta
- Re: womens and relativity
- References:
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: YBM
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: vic
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: vic
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: vic
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: vic
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: vic
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: J. Horta
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: womens and relativity
- From: J. Horta
- Re: womens and relativity
- Prev by Date: Re: GR ?
- Next by Date: Re: GR ?
- Previous by thread: Re: womens and relativity
- Next by thread: Re: womens and relativity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|