Re: GR ?
- From: "Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:12:08 +0100
"sue jahn" <susysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42e55061$0$18642$14726298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1122315449.90945.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| snip
|
| > | > You appear from my pov to have jumped the rails Tom as you have been
| > writing
| > | > that observation cannot effect the conditions of the objects under
| > | > observation
| > |
| > | The Coulomb force between a photoelectron in a rail passenger's
| > | retina and a lightning stroke is insufficient for this to occur.
However
| > | the Coulomb force between a free particle and HEP apparatus is
| > | sufficient for observation to affect the conditions.
| >
| > Yes I agree that locally the observer can effect the observed but its
| > difficult to see how looking at a star can effect it to any noticeable
| > degree. BTW I was just trying to sort out the apparent, from my pov,
| > incoherence that Tom posts. I do try and understand him but he seems to
keep
| > shifting his position to fit the situation which is fine for a game of
| > stone,paper,string but seems to just make him look silly in the realm of
| > scientific enquiry.
|
| It was an opportune moment to show where SR really can be applied.
|
| I don't know of any clock experiments that are not the result of a
| misinterpretation of AE's speculative writing style combined with
| reader's guilable reading style. The SUMO clock might be an
| exception because it would show that AE's concept of time in
| GR is actually related to the energy lost to local matter.
Thats an idea if I understand you.
|
| >
| > |
| > | As you have pointed out earlier,
| > | mounting a linac on a railcar moving at 1/2 c can produce
| > | electrons moving at 1.498... times the speed of light wrt the
| > | "embankment".
| >
| > Yes this point never seems to be addressed by the advocates, perhaps
they
| > will one day{:-)
|
| Only when it is taught that way in the creationism classes. :o)
|
| Sue...
| >
|
| snip
|
|
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GR ?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: GR ?
- References:
- GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- From: sue jahn
- GR ?
- Prev by Date: Re: GR ?
- Next by Date: Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
- Previous by thread: Re: GR ?
- Next by thread: Re: GR ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|