Re: GR ?


"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1122326795.582385.28630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|
| Significant Zero wrote:
| > "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:1122315025.227243.257180@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > |
| > |
| > | Significant Zero wrote:
| > | > "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > | > news:1122273688.678256.104230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | >
| > | > snip
| > | > | Why not just tell people "action" is invariant, or
| > | > | is typing your forte. Planck's "h",
| > | > |
| > | > | h= N*ergs*secs = N*ergs'*secs' .
| > | > |
| > | > | Let's try to explain why action is invariant.
| > | > | Ken
| > | > |
| > | >
| > | > That a broad one Ken but is not action defined as a product of time
and
| > | > distance ?
| > |
| > | No
| > |
| > | > Tom seems to be saying the time and distance are invariant except
when
| > he
| > | > needs them to be variant to support some view like the Twins.
| > |
| > | Sig 0,
| > |
| > | 1) Action is WORK x TIME, please look that up,
| > | it's vital in physics to understand that!
| >
| > Yes I understood that was the common definition I was just trying to
ease an
| > improvement in {:-)
| > i.e defining work\energy as an intrinsic difference between spaces.(dont
ask
| > {:-)
| > |
| > | 2) See that Planck's h= N x ERGS x SECONDS
| > | and is invariant, (same in all CS's) look that up.
| > | (N~6.625x10^-27 is a scalar that varies with better
| > | measuring every decade or so).
| >
| > Yes I have erg = 100 * 10E-9 joule and h = 6.62606876 *10E-34 joules a
sec
| > and a joule being equal to a Newton meter with a Newton being equal to
meter
| > kilogram sec -2 which I'm not convinced is an invariant
| > |
| > | 3) If dx/dt =c in one CS then in all CS's dx'/dt' =c ,
| > | that's why "c" is the same in all CS's, as you've
| > | heard.
| >
| > Sure I agree that c is a valid local constant but if dx/dt is a
| > proportionally environmental dependant variant then this can also
explains
| > why c can be constant and also a environmental dependant variant.
| >
| > |
| > | Sig 0, understand those 3 points above and that's
| > | 90% of relativity.
| >
| > I think I understand but don't necessarily agree on the invariance of
some
| > aspects.
|
| Good for Sig 0...
|
| No need to agree with the 3 points, just understand
| the enemy you are attacking.
|
| Pick one and attack...if it's a reasonable aggression,
| people will think on it.
Hello Ken
I think attack is a rather stong word how about a fierce nuzzel {:-) as that
is all I feel able to do at the moment (central heating to fix, 8mm
microbore I installed 30 yrs ago).

GR curvature implies variance in space-time (in my view anyway) and this
variance could be seen as a potential gradient with mass being the positive
indicator of the gradient and relative absence of mass the negative
indicator as perhaps shown by Assis.

I would be very interested if you have some way of confirming your statement
of the invariance of h or do you not agree that h is derived from the
definition of meters, kilograms and seconds. Perhaps your view is that
meters, kilograms and seconds are environmentally invariant as perhaps Tom
and Bill think sometimes?

|
| Ken
|
| > > |You don't need to believe the
| > | above, who cares, but that gives you're brain most
| > | of what relativity is in physical nutshell.
| > |
| > | Enjoy it...play with it...fun stuff...
| > | Ken
| > |
|
--
Significant Zero E-field = Electric field, M-field =Magnetic field, two
unbound field effects
http://home.freeuk.com/paulps/
Maybe updates. (1-(1/(1/3))^2)/(1 + (1/(1/3))^2) = - 0.08 = FTL ? -p<+p or
(m*-v)<(m*+v) or (m*-c^2)<(m*+c^2) =g?




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: GR ?
    ... Significant Zero wrote: ... > |> and a joule being equal to a Newton meter with a Newton being equal to ... > |> why c can be constant and also a environmental dependant variant. ... > of the invariance of h ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GR ?
    ... Significant Zero wrote: ... > | and is invariant, look that up. ... > why c can be constant and also a environmental dependant variant. ... > | of what relativity is in physical nutshell. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
    ... the meter is no longer a constant it is a *factor* depending ... give up the distance to. ... So when measuring the *LIGHSPEED* the distances light travel per ... to anyone that light does not travel invariant through vacuum space, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
    ... the meter is no longer a constant it is a *factor* depending ... give up the distance to. ... So when measuring the *LIGHSPEED* the distances light travel per ... to anyone that light does not travel invariant through vacuum space, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GR ?
    ... |> | Let's try to explain why action is invariant. ... Sure I agree that c is a valid local constant but if dx/dt is a ... why c can be constant and also a environmental dependant variant. ... | of what relativity is in physical nutshell. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)