Re: relativity concerns

From: "@echo off" <blind@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 27 Jul 2005 06:22:46 -0700

N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
> Dear Jerry T:
>
> "Jerry T" <l1l1l1l@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1122408120.620661.245890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > are there special relativiy concerns when dealing
> > with dls?
>
> "dls" means what?

pcs

why answering when you dont know

>
> > or c is taken as infinitly?
>
> Only when the velocities considered are much less than c. This
> allows Newton to provide accurate predictions.
>
> David A. Smith

particle particle collision concerns, what about photon particle?

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: relativity concerns
  - From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)

References:
- Re: relativity concerns
  - From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)

Prev by Date: Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
Next by Date: Re: topological equivalence?
Previous by thread: Re: relativity concerns
Next by thread: Re: relativity concerns
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: relativity concerns
... >>> are there special relativiy concerns when dealing ... >>> with dls? ...
(sci.physics.relativity)
Re: Distribution List in OWA not Outlook
... Looks like this may be a problem on just my pc (outlook) i checked on 2 ... more PCs and the DLs were there....now to fix my problem. ...
(microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
Re: relativity concerns
... > are there special relativiy concerns when dealing ... "dls" means what? ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.physics.relativity)