Re: relativity concerns
- From: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:24:31 -0700
Dear Jerry T:
"Jerry T" <l1l1l1l@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1122477037.842485.120790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
>> Dear Jerry T:
>>
>> "Jerry T" <l1l1l1l@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1122408120.620661.245890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > are there special relativiy concerns when dealing
>> > with dls?
>>
>> "dls" means what?
>
> all right, you are nice
>
> photon - particle collision when in brownian motion
Then the answer is "yes", barely. The photoelectric effect shows
marked effect when the photoemitting surface is heated.
Additionally, characteristic emissions spectra of "stuff" is
broadened by increasing temperature.
But the gamma of velocities associated with even 25000000 K is
not too terribly much larger than 1.
And "photon - particle collision" does require a charged particle
as the particle, and "collision" isn't a very useful term here.
David A. Smith
.
- References:
- Re: relativity concerns
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: relativity concerns
- Prev by Date: Re: relativity concerns
- Next by Date: Re: Simple Sagnac
- Previous by thread: Re: relativity concerns
- Next by thread: topological equivalence?
- Index(es):