sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Electromagnetic stress-energy tensor :)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity of time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Electromagnetic stress-energy tensor :)
  • From: Lacustral
• Re: relativity of time
  • From: francisco
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: shevek
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Kim B
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity of time
  • From: francisco
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Harry
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: bz
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: Harry
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Fermat's last theorem solved simple answer
  • From: Arthur Knight
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Harry
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Harry
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Harry
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Electromagnetic stress-energy tensor :)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Electromagnetic stress-energy tensor :)
  • From: Bilge
• the sweep rate of the tail
  • From: francisco
• Re: Electromagnetic stress-energy tensor :)
  • From: the softrat
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: wespe
• Re: Electromagnetic stress-energy tensor :)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: definition of God
  • From: RP
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: definition of God
  • From: Bilge
• Re: time dilation experimet
  • From: xxein
• Re: relativity of time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: russell
• Re: the 1st law and reference frames
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: the 1st law and reference frames
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: a special relativity theory problem
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of time
  • From: Sue...
• relativity of time
  • From: francisco
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: sal
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: vern
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: ianparker2
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: ianparker2
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Kim B
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: wespe
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: defamation
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: bz
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: bz
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: sal
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Electromagnetic stress-energy tensor :)
  • From: Lacustral
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Harry
• check out my short film, "Solipsist"
  • From: lukad
• check out my short film, "Solipsist"
  • From: lukad
• Re: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics
  • From: h . poropudas
• Re: the 1st law and reference frames
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: sal
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: bz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: re:time dilation experimet
  • From: Harry
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: the 1st law and reference frames
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: Harry
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the 1st law and reference frames
  • From: francisco
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harald EPFL
• re:time dilation experimet
  • From: francisco
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Kim B
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Kim B
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Harald EPFL
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Kim B
• Re: the 1st law and reference frames
  • From: DarkD
• the 1st law and reference frames
  • From: francisco
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a special relativity theory problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: time dilation
  • From: francisco
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: wespe
• Re: time dilation
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: dseppala
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: sal
• Re: time dilation
  • From: TomGee
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: slefkowit
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: dseppala
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
  • From: androc1es
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: twin patadox question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: shevek
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• twin patadox question
  • From: slefkowit
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: sal
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: Bilge
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: sal
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Harald EPFL
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: question
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: shevek
• Re: newton's first law
  • From: Bilge
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Gravity and Entropy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: bz
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: JanPB
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: JanPB
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: RP
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: JanPB
• Re: newton's first law
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Gravity and Entropy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: David Marsden
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: wespe
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is natural
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: dseppala
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is natural
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Gravity and Entropy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• newton's first law
  • From: francisco
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a special relativity theory problem
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is natural
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Modern Cosmological Epicycles
  • From: xxein
• time dilation
  • From: francisco
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: bz
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: JanPB
• Re: a special relativity theory problem
  • From: Sue...
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Gravity and Entropy
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Gravity and Entropy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is natural
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: a special relativity theory problem
  • From: francisco
• Re: a special relativity theory problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• a special relativity theory problem
  • From: francisco
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: Chris
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: Chris
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: John Zinni
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: francisco
• Re: What is natural
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: JanPB
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: John Zinni
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: John Zinni
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Androcles
• What is natural
  • From: Arthur Knight
• UNCERTAiNTY Principle REDUNDANT.!!
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• space
  • From: Arthur Knight
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: the softrat
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: JanPB
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: the softrat
• Re: how did galileo know...
  • From: John Zinni
• Re: question
  • From: francisco
• how did galileo know...
  • From: francisco
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Nick
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: wespe
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: wespe
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: question
  • From: Bilge
• Re: lotus sutra
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: dseppala
• Space easijly understood
  • From: Arthur Knight
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: bz
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: bz
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: bz
• question
  • From: francisco
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: JanPB
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Kim B
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Kim B
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Kim B
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Lorentz
  • From: francisco
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• entropy is a state variable
  • From: francisco
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: what is flaming
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: defamation
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Lorentz
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Heisenberg vs. Lorentz
  • From: RichD
• Re: Gravity and Entropy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: wespe
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: dseppala
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: dseppala
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: sal
• Re: what is flaming
  • From: the softrat
• Re: relationship between the law of large numbers and entropy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Nick
• Re: what is flaming
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: what is a troll
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Gravity and Entropy
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Cyde Weys
• Re: Gravity as Falling Space + Reward
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: Androcles
• what is flaming
  • From: francisco
• Re: defamation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• what is a troll
  • From: francisco
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: lotus sutra
  • From: francisco
• Re: defamation
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: lotus sutra
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: how to arrive at x' = x - vt
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: how to arrive at x' = x - vt
  • From: Harald EPFL
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: how to arrive at x' = x - vt
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: how to arrive at x' = x - vt
  • From: francisco
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: how to arrive at x' = x - vt
  • From: francisco
• Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: how to arrive at x' = x - vt
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: shevek
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: shevek
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: how to arrive at x' = x - vt
  • From: Harry
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: vern
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Harry
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: TomGee
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Thermodynamics, Relativity, and Gravitation:Evidence for a Close Link Between the Three Theories
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: how to arrive at x' = x - vt
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: defamation
  • From: Bilge
• Re: how to arrive at x' = x - vt
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Kim B
• Re: how to arrive at x' = x - vt
  • From: Harry
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Harry
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Harry
• how to arrive at x' = x - vt
  • From: francisco
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: dseppala
• defamation
  • From: francisco
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: nam myoho renge kyo
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Interval
  • From: Bilge
• lotus sutra
  • From: francisco
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Androcles
• nam myoho renge kyo
  • From: francisco
• om
  • From: francisco
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: JanPB
• Re: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: relationship between the law of large numbers and entropy
  • From: francisco
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: francisco
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relationship between the law of large numbers and entropy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relationship between the law of large numbers and entropy
  • From: francisco
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: relationship between the law of large numbers and entropy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: noether's theorem
  • From: Bilge
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Nick
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: wespe
• noether's theorem
  • From: francisco
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• relationship between the law of large numbers and entropy
  • From: francisco
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Time, space and atom
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: entropy, gravitation, and thermodynamics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: dseppala
• Re: definition of the law of large numbers
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Interval
  • From: Bill Hobba
• definition of the law of large numbers
  • From: francisco
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: what says that heat must flow from a higher to a lesser temperature gradient?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Thermodynamics, Relativity, and Gravitation:Evidence for a Close Link Between the Three Theories
  • From: francisco
• what says that heat must flow from a higher to a lesser temperature gradient?
  • From: francisco
• entropy, gravitation, and thermodynamics
  • From: francisco
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: markwh04
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: francisco
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: francisco
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: shevek
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: penguinista
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: shevek
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: vern
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: ianparker2
• I have made Einstein's just discovered 1925 writings on the Bose-Einstein condensate available as 1 indexed pdf file for download.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: shevek
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: shevek
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: shevek
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: bz
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The theories of Yilmaz, Puthoff & Haisch on Gravity and Zero Point Energy
  • From: dirkbontes
• Re: The theories of Yilmaz, Puthoff & Haisch on Gravity and Zero Point Energy
  • From: dirkbontes
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: bz
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: bz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Interval
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Time, space and atom
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: TomGee
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: YBM
• Re: Time, space and atom
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gravitational Collapse (Simple model)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• concerning good and evil (a particular example)
  • From: francisco
• Re: Interval
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Earn 12% daily of your investment!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Interval
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Interval
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: how does God defy the second law of thermodynamics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Spoonfed
• Gravitational Collapse (Simple model)
  • From: Joe
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• how does God defy the second law of thermodynamics
  • From: francisco
• Re: definition of God
  • From: Androcles
• Re: definition of God
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Androcles
• Re: definition of God
  • From: Androcles
• Re: definition of God
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Time, space and atom
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Gravity as falling space ("quantum foam")
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Interval
  • From: sal
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On light aberration
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: definition of God
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On light aberration
  • From: vern
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Interval
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• On light aberration
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Re: Interval
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Interval
  • From: PD
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Interval
  • From: sal
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: bz
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Interval
  • From: sal
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Interval
  • From: Curt
• Re: Interval
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Interval
  • From: sal
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: bz
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Interval
  • From: sal
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: NAVSTAR GPS NTS-2 Satellite
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Interval
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Interval
  • From: PD
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Interval
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: PD
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Interval
  • From: sal
• Re: Spacetime radiation (kst).
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: bz
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Article: What if. Young Einstein had been ignored
  • From: ianparker2
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Teaching Relativity Simply III
  • From: Harry
• Re: definition of God
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: Harry
• Re: a prayer to You, God (something to chant nam-myoho-renge-kyo for)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Interval
  • From: Curt
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: bz
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Interval
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Interval
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Interval
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Spacetime radiation (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Interval
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: bz
• Re: Spacetime radiation (kst).
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: bz
• Re: definition of God
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: JanPB
• definition of God
  • From: francisco
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Time, space and atom
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Interval
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Interval
  • From: Nick
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: bz
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Spacetime radiation (kst).
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Spacetime radiation (kst).
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Interval
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: shevek
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: shevek
• Re: Article: What if. Young Einstein had been ignored
  • From: sal
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Interval
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spacetime radiation (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Teaching Relativiy Simply II (re-post)
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• a prayer to You, God (something to chant nam-myoho-renge-kyo for)
  • From: francisco
• Re: Interval
  • From: sal
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: GOD=G_uv: A SCIENTIFIC PROPHECY
  • From: heywood_jablowme2
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: bz
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Article: What if. Young Einstein had been ignored
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Acceleration
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Article: What if. Young Einstein had been ignored
  • From: ianparker2
• Re: Interval
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: bz
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Are Scientific Journals Passe? Has Peer Review Become Sneer Review? Do Scientists Steal From Submitted Papers? Is the Internet The New Way? MDT Rock On!!
  • From: Bilge
• Interval
  • From: Curt
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Teaching Relativiy Simply II (re-post)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Spacetime radiation (kst).
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Acceleration
  • From: jbaloun
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: The theories of Yilmaz, Puthoff & Haisch on Gravity and Zero Point Energy
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Article: What if. Young Einstein had been ignored
  • From: xxein
• Re: Teaching Relativiy Simply II (re-post)
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Article: What if. Young Einstein had been ignored
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Discrete time
  • From: F. Kuik
• Re: Teaching Relativity Simply III
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is temperature relative? No
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GOD=G_uv: A SCIENTIFIC PROPHECY
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Discrete time
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Can "Space and Time" Be Revised?
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: The theories of Yilmaz, Puthoff & Haisch on Gravity and Zero Point Energy
  • From: shevek
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: bz
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: bz
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Discrete time
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Science in a Free Society
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Teaching Relativity Simply III
  • From: YBM
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Discrete time
  • From: Aage Andersen
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: bz
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: bz
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: Teaching Relativity Simply III
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: bz
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Teaching Relativity Simply III
  • From: Relativity Intro
• Teaching Relativiy Simply II (re-post)
  • From: Relativity Intro
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The theories of Yilmaz, Puthoff & Haisch on Gravity and Zero Point Energy
  • From: dirkbontes
• Re: Science in a Free Society
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spacetime radiation (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Discrete time
  • From: RP
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: To the Idiot too Stupid to Debate Math Concepts and only says "Idiot"
  • From: Bilge
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: To the Idiot too Stupid to Debate Math Concepts and only says "Idiot"
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Spacetime radiation (kst).
  • From: Bilge
• Discrete time
  • From: F. Kuik
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Have I got this right?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spacetime radiation (kst).
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Max
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Have I got this right?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Have I got this right?
  • From: Eli Botkin
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Have I got this right?
  • From: Tim Walters
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Quantum momentum?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Spacetime radiation (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Minimum state of information
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum momentum?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Quantum momentum?
  • From: jbaloun
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Minimum state of information
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Minimum state of information
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Quantum momentum?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Quantum momentum?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Quantum momentum?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: shevek
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Quantum momentum?
  • From: jbaloun
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: bz
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Minimum state of information
  • From: jbaloun
• Re: Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July '02]
  • From: shevek
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Androcles
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Thomas
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Thomas
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: bz
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Just found einstein manuscript in Leiden
  • From: F. Kuik
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Thomas
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Last Tribulations on God, Spirit and the Aether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity ! - Final version
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Spoonfed
• Last Tribulations on God, Spirit and the Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: macromitch
• Follow-Up: FLRW curvature and scale factor
  • From: Spoonfed
• Follow-Up: CBR Acoustics?
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: PD
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Joatman71
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: macromitch
• Re: mass filled universe
  • From: thomas . smid
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: thomas . smid
• mass filled universe
  • From: penguinista
• Re: The reason why SR is incomplete
  • From: dishington
• Re: Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: PD
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: ianparker2
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Can a light bulb run out of photons?
  • From: Joatman71
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Harry
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Rigid rod problem
  • From: bz
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: YBM
• Is temperature relative?
  • From: sal
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Androcles
• Twin paradox resolved - big error in Relativity !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Rigid rod problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: xxein
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: xxein
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: sal
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: xxein
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Article: Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intell...
  • From: TomGee
• Hawking Radiation? Mass don't leak
  • From: macromitch
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: sal
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: sal
• Re: Article: Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intell...
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: COUNT THE STARS CON-TEST -- Hubble Photo - Holy Shit!
  • From: sal
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: PD
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: russell
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: sal
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: jem
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: jem
• Re: NAVSTAR GPS NTS-2 Satellite
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: NAVSTAR GPS NTS-2 Satellite
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: russell
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hawking Radiation
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: AAtt
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: Harry
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: dave pryce
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: dave pryce
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: Max
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: sal
• Re: NAVSTAR GPS NTS-2 Satellite
  • From: the softrat
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: dave pryce
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: sal
• Re: can anybody tell me?
  • From: alanmc95210
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: PD
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: russell
• can anybody tell me?
  • From: dave pryce
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: NAVSTAR GPS NTS-2 Satellite
  • From: Androcles
• Re: NAVSTAR GPS NTS-2 Satellite
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Androcles
• Re: NAVSTAR GPS NTS-2 Satellite
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: sal
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: russell
• Re: NAVSTAR GPS NTS-2 Satellite
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: COUNT THE STARS CON-TEST -- Hubble Photo - Holy Shit!
  • From: sal
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: NAVSTAR GPS NTS-2 Satellite
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Androcles
• Re: COUNT THE STARS CON-TEST -- Hubble Photo - Holy Shit!
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: bz
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: bz
• Re: NAVSTAR GPS NTS-2 Satellite
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Harry
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: NAVSTAR GPS NTS-2 Satellite
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The reason why SR is incomplete
  • From: kenseto
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• NAVSTAR GPS NTS-2 Satellite
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: ianparker2
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: bz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The reason why SR is incomplete
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The reason why SR is incomplete
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electron Diffraction
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Electron Diffraction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space/Time, Zero & Energy characteristics
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Electron Diffraction
  • From: bern11
• Re: The reason why SR is incomplete
  • From: kenseto
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: PD
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The reason why SR is incomplete
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The reason why SR is incomplete
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The reason why SR is incomplete
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Space/Time, Zero & Energy characteristics
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space/Time, Zero & Energy characteristics
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: PD
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: Significant Zero
• Wielding Ockham's Razor
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Space/Time, Zero & Energy characteristics
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Harry
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: G
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Electron Diffraction
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Electron Diffraction
  • From: bern11
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: YBM
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: t' = (t -vx/cc)/sqrt( 1- vv/cc ) = t sqrt( 1- vv/cc) ?
  • From: Eugeniusz W
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: t' = (t -vx/cc)/sqrt( 1- vv/cc ) = t sqrt( 1- vv/cc) ?
  • From: Eugeniusz W
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: Nick
• Re: Space/Time, Zero & Energy characteristics
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Nick
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: bz
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Twin paradox invalidated 2
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: PD
• Re: Space/Time, Zero & Energy characteristics
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: russell
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: PD
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: PD
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: ianparker2
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: bz
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space/Time, Zero & Energy characteristics
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: bz
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: kk
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space/Time, Zero & Energy characteristics
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Space/Time, Zero & Energy characteristics
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: bz
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: bz
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time, Zero & Energy characteristics
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time, Zero & Energy characteristics
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space/Time, Zero & Energy characteristics
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Space/Time, Zero & Energy characteristics
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: ianparker2
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: G
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: sue jahn
• Teaching relativity simply II
  • From: Relativity Intro
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How To Race A Photon And A Muon
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: bz
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: Androcles
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: YBM
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question from a non-physics person
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Significant Zero
• Question from a non-physics person
  • From: roborndoff
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Take the rate out of the EP * Nth Complexity
  • From: Nick
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+2
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0+1
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Nick
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0
  • From: sue jahn
• Space/Time/Energy characteristics .0
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: bz
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Albert was a sex maniac!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: G
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Kim B
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: G
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Albert was a sex maniac!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Albert was a sex maniac!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: russell
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Nick
• Re: Albert was a sex maniac!
  • From: Nick
• Re: Albert was a sex maniac!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: bz
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sal
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: YBM
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: YBM
• Ref: www.agora.demon.co.uk/dynamics.txt
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: hdr
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: russell
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: russell
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: russell
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: bz
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Albert was a sex maniac!
  • From: Chris
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: bz
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: brendan . roycroft
• Re: I like double negatives.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: brendan . roycroft
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: sue jahn
• shrinking event horizons and naked singularities
  • From: brendan . roycroft
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: bz
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: bz
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: Harry
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: brendan . roycroft
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: brendan . roycroft
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: ianparker2
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: Androcles
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: bz
• Re: charged black hole metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: sue jahn
• charged black hole metric
  • From: brendan . roycroft
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: bz
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: Harry
• Re: German Defense Minister Confirms CIA Involvement in 9/11
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: bz
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: Teflon
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Assignment for clever Einsteinians
  • From: bz
• Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Linear treatment of GR
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Linear treatment of GR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: comets and asteroids geodesic path
  • From: the softrat
• Re: I like double negatives.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: t' = (t -vx/cc)/sqrt( 1- vv/cc ) = t sqrt( 1- vv/cc) ?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Teaching relativity simply
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Androcles
• Teaching relativity simply
  • From: Relativity Intro
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• German Defense Minister Confirms CIA Involvement in 9/11
  • From: Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Space/Time characteristics
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: I like double negatives.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: russell
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BB questioned by article in Astrophysical Jr.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: hello
  • From: sal
• Re: hello
  • From: sal
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Sue...
• Re: BB questioned by article in Astrophysical Jr.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: russell
• Re: BB questioned by article in Astrophysical Jr.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: shuba
• Re: autym is gay
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: weak and strong forces in black holes
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Sue...
• Re: weak and strong forces in black holes
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: russell
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: hello
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relatively speaking
  • From: The exploding head of FreeSpeechStore
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: michalchik
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: t' = (t -vx/cc)/sqrt( 1- vv/cc ) = t sqrt( 1- vv/cc) ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: hello
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: BB questioned by article in Astrophysical Jr.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: origin/history of the term "exterior derivative"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: Jim Black
• origin/history of the term "exterior derivative"
  • From: mot12345
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: the softrat
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: the softrat
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: the softrat
• Re: BB questioned by article in Astrophysical Jr.
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: BB questioned by article in Astrophysical Jr.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: J. Horta
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: BB questioned by article in Astrophysical Jr.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: autym is gay
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space/Time characteristics
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• autym is gay
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: weak and strong forces in black holes
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: weak and strong forces in black holes
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: Ghost's physics problems.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relatively speaking
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: t' = (t -vx/cc)/sqrt( 1- vv/cc ) = t sqrt( 1- vv/cc) ?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: weak and strong forces in black holes
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space/Time characteristics
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: Relatively speaking
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Space/Time characteristics
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time characteristics
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: t' = (t -vx/cc)/sqrt( 1- vv/cc ) = t sqrt( 1- vv/cc) ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Ghost's physics problems.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: t' = (t -vx/cc)/sqrt( 1- vv/cc ) = t sqrt( 1- vv/cc) ?
  • From: Eugeniusz W
• Re: t' = (t -vx/cc)/sqrt( 1- vv/cc ) = t sqrt( 1- vv/cc) ?
  • From: Eugeniusz W
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: t' = (t -vx/cc)/sqrt( 1- vv/cc ) = t sqrt( 1- vv/cc) ?
  • From: Eugeniusz W
• Re: t' = (t -vx/cc)/sqrt( 1- vv/cc ) = t sqrt( 1- vv/cc) ?
  • From: Androcles
• Ghost's physics problems.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Robert Kolker
• t' = (t -vx/cc)/sqrt( 1- vv/cc ) = t sqrt( 1- vv/cc) ?
  • From: Eugeniusz Warenda
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Einstein Trivia: Einstein's interest in Child Psychology
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space/Time characteristics
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Susan - Re: Help with DeBroglie-Einstein:
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space/Time characteristics
  • From: Significant Zero
• Susan - Re: Help with DeBroglie-Einstein:
  • From: Teflon
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Space/Time characteristics
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space/Time characteristics
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Susan - Re: Help with DeBroglie-Einstein:
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: Gravity
  • From: PD
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gravity
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Space/Time characteristics
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Relatively speaking
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relatively speaking
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space/Time characteristics
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Space/Time characteristics
  • From: sue jahn
• Space/Time characteristics
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: bz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Roberts' neutrino factory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Roberts' neutrino factory.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Roberts' neutrino factory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: gravity and spin animations
  • From: ianparker2
• Re: Roberts' neutrino factory.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Linear treatment of GR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: russell
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Kim B
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB Like it or not there is absolute motion
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Help with DeBroglie-Einstein:
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: YADOLT
  • From: Perspicacious
• YADOLT
  • From: sal
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Linear treatment of GR
  • From: Joe
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: russell
• Re: Absolute Motion Of Earth Relative To CB Like it or not there is absolute motion
  • From: Arthur Knight
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Help with DeBroglie-Einstein:
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Help with DeBroglie-Einstein:
  • From: Teflon
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: russell
• Re: Help with DeBroglie-Einstein:
  • From: PD
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: russell
• Re: Roberts' neutrino factory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Help with DeBroglie-Einstein:
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• gravity and spin animations
  • From: Teflon
• Re: Help with DeBroglie-Einstein:
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Roberts' neutrino factory.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Help with DeBroglie-Einstein:
  • From: PD
• Re: how to answer this question?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Roberts' neutrino factory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: russell
• Help with DeBroglie-Einstein:
  • From: Teflon
• Re: Help with DeBroglie-Einstein:
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Twin Paradox Resolution
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Roberts' neutrino factory.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: how to answer this question?
  • From: PD
• Re: weak and strong forces in black holes
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: weak and strong forces in black holes
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity
  • From: PD
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: russell
• Re: Special relativistic equivalence principle
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: sue jahn
• Roberts' neutrino factory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: russell
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Islam.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: harry
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: jem
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Special relativistic equivalence principle
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Special relativistic equivalence principle
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: how to answer this question?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: Significant Zero
• Imaginary Space (secular version)
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: SR vs GR
  • From: bernardz
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR vs GR
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: SR vs GR
  • From: bernardz
• Re: Special relativistic equivalence principle
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Special relativistic equivalence principle
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Special relativistic equivalence principle
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: A funny kind of rectilinearity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Special relativistic equivalence principle
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Special relativistic equivalence principle
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A funny kind of rectilinearity
  • From: msadkins04
• Special relativistic equivalence principle
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: SDaryl
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Philosophy of Life.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gravity in the Zero Origin Universe.
  • From: Max Keon
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: jem
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Kim B
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: Nick
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Mike
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Einstein had to survive his education
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: lay question: implications
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Islam.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Twin paradox invalidated
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Pauli exclusion principle and blackholes.
  • From: michalchik
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sue jahn
• Gravitational slowing of time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Henri Poincaré Discovered Special Relativity, not Albert Einstein
  • From: shuba
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: lay question: implications
  • From: jumpin jeff
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: bz
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR vs GR
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Philosophy of Life.
  • From: jem
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Philosophy of Life.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: mazafaka
• weak and strong forces in black holes
  • From: mazafaka
• all speeds are constant
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: SR vs GR
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Distance, Duration & Action, oops camera
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: James Jolley
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: James Jolley
• Re: The Positron and the Trend of Physics Toward Religion
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: bz
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: bz
• Re: Distance, Duration & Action, oops camera
  • From: xxein
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: alanmc95210
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: bz
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: PD
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: PD
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Time is absolute
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: vanep
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Gravity
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Time is absolute
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sal
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Gravity
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Hawking Radiation
  • From: PD
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity
  • From: PD
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Sue...
• Gravity
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: PD
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: About the TRICK in coordinates introduced by Kruskal and Szekeres in 1961
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: bz
• Re: Time is absolut
  • From: jem
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: jem
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Time is absolut
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Hawking Radiation
  • From: brendan . roycroft
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Harry
• Distance, Duration & Action, oops camera
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Hawking Radiation
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: ether might be god
  • From: em
• Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Sue...
• Falling photons http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9907017
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Islam.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: SR vs GR
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: vanep
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity in the Zero Origin Universe.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Hawking Radiation
  • From: brendan . roycroft
• Hawking Radiation
  • From: brendan . roycroft
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Natural, the Physical, the Real, and the Material.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sal
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: PD
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The Natural, the Physical, the Real, and the Material.
  • From: AllYou!
• Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: SR vs GR
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Significant Zero
• The Natural, the Physical, the Real, and the Material.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: PD
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: jem
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Harry
• Re: Time
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Time
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Time
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: bz
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: bz
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: bz
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Gravity in the Zero Origin Universe.
  • From: Max Keon
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Harry
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Harry
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Harry
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Harry
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Time
  • From: TomGee
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: bz
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: russell
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: bz
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: penguinista
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Harry
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: ianparker2
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Verification of theories
  • From: PD
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: PD
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Harry
• Re: Time
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Time
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Harry
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: lay question: implications
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: lay question: implications
  • From: jumpin jeff
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: A funny kind of rectilinearity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Tom Capizzi
• Re: lay question: implications
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time
  • From: TomGee
• Re: SR vs GR
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Verification of theories
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: bz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Sue...
• SR vs GR
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Verification of theories
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: definition of simultaneity and on the relativity of lenghts and times by a. einstein
  • From: PD
• lay question: implications
  • From: jumpin jeff
• Re: Time
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth. [BIG FUMBLE DETECTED]
  • From: Kim B
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: PD
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Harry
• Re: Wrong physics correction
  • From: Josef Matz
• Nuke Model
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Harry
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: Harry
• Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Bilge
• some new physics and science group.
  • From: vignesh
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Tom Capizzi
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A funny kind of rectilinearity
  • From: shuba
• Re: A funny kind of rectilinearity
  • From: msadkins04
• Re: The paradoxes of time and the origin of gravity.
  • From: Rolf Guthmann
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: YBM
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: This American Life (anybody recognize this guy?)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: mazafaka
• Annotated Einstein Clock
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: modelling a hole
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: modelling a hole
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: This American Life (anybody recognize this guy?)
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: mazafaka
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: This American Life (anybody recognize this guy?)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: This American Life (anybody recognize this guy?)
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Kim B
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Kim B
• Re: The paradoxes of time and the origin of gravity.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The paradoxes of time and the origin of gravity.
  • From: Rolf Guthmann
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: bz
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: bz
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: Bilge
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: definition of time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: David Marsden
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: EL
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the reality is only in our brains
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: EL
• Re: the reality is only in our brains
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: the reality is only in our brains
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: James Jolley
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: The paradoxes of time and the origin of gravity.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: definition of time
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The paradoxes of time and the origin of gravity.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• The paradoxes of time and the origin of gravity.
  • From: Rolf Guthmann
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: topological equivalence?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: concerning a platform and a carriage in uniform translatory motion
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: concerning a platform and a carriage in uniform translatory motion
  • From: francisco
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: markwh04
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Verification of theories
  • From: chip
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: chip
• Re: concerning a platform and a carriage in uniform translatory motion
  • From: chip
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: chip
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: concerning a platform and a carriage in uniform translatory motion
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: chip
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: chip
• concerning a platform and a carriage in uniform translatory motion
  • From: francisco
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: chip
• dialectics, hegelian (a particular example)
  • From: francisco
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: chip
• Re: on the relativity of lengths
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: on the relativity of lengths
  • From: francisco
• Re: definition of time
  • From: francisco
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: Bilge
• Re: definition of time
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: on the relativity of lengths
  • From: Sue...
• Re: on the relativity of lengths
  • From: francisco
• Re: the reality is only in our brains
  • From: TomGee
• Re: on the relativity of lengths
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: definition of time
  • From: francisco
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: on the relativity of lengths
  • From: francisco
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Bilge
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: James Jolley
• Re: on the relativity of lengths
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: definition of simultaneity and on the relativity of lenghts and times by a. einstein
  • From: EL
• Re: Light & very small distances - paradox??
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: definition of time
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: photon stuff...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: photon stuff...
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: photon stuff...
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• on the relativity of lengths
  • From: francisco
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A funny kind of rectilinearity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A funny kind of rectilinearity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• definition of time
  • From: francisco
• Re: Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Sid Lanier
• A funny kind of rectilinearity
  • From: msadkins04
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Sid Lanier
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Sid Lanier
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Little guy on the train
  • From: sue jahn
• Little guy on the train
  • From: Sid Lanier
• Re: definition of simultaneity and on the relativity of lenghts and times by a. einstein
  • From: Eugene Shubert
• Re: definition of simultaneity and on the relativity of lenghts and times by a. einstein
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Daniel Cook
• Re: Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Light & very small distances - paradox??
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: the reality is only in our brains
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: the reality is only in our brains
  • From: TomGee
• Re: definition of simultaneity and on the relativity of lenghts and times by a. einstein
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Light & very small distances - paradox??
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Relativistic electromagnetic equations, gamma not required
  • From: srp
• Re: Relativistic electromagnetic equations, gamma not required
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Relativistic electromagnetic equations, gamma not required
  • From: srp
• Re: Relativistic electromagnetic equations, gamma not required
  • From: srp
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: the reality is only in our brains
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Josef Matz
• definition of simultaneity and on the relativity of lenghts and times by a. einstein
  • From: francisco
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What are String Theories Laws? What Are String Thoery's Postulates? Has String Theory Accomplished Anything? How Much Has String Theory Cost Us?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Relativistic electromagnetic equations, gamma not required
  • From: RP
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity concerns
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativistic electromagnetic equations, gamma not required
  • From: srp
• Re: The bag is out of the cat.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: bz
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: modelling a hole
  • From: Aristotle
• This American Life (anybody recognize this guy?)
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: bz
• Re: Relativistic electromagnetic equations, gamma not required
  • From: srp
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: bz
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: bz
• Relativistic electromagnetic equations, gamma not required
  • From: srp
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The bag is out of the cat.
  • From: Lee Hussey
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: bz
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Wrong physics
  • From: markwh04
• Wrong physics
  • From: Josef Matz
• The electromagnetic paradox and our new space-time.
  • From: Rolf Guthmann
• Re: the reality is only in our brains
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: the reality is only in our brains
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: bz
• Re: photon stuff...
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: the reality is only in our brains
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: Light & very small distances - paradox??
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Light & very small distances - paradox??
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: All Tied Up & Strung Along: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! Great Summer Work For Physicists!! No Knowledge of Physics Needed!!
  • From: greatbooksclassics
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: What are String Theories Laws? What Are String Thoery's Postulates? Has String Theory Accomplished Anything? How Much Has String Theory Cost Us?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Harry
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Relativistic electromagnetic equations, gamma not required
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Light & very small distances - paradox??
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Light & very small distances - paradox??
  • From: Rjcflyer
• Re: Another Hurdle for LeSagian Theory
  • From: xxein
• Re: topological equivalence?
  • From: ajiko
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: bz
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: bz
• Re: relativity concerns
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: xxein
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Nick
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Relativistic electromagnetic equations, gamma not required
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: bz
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Relativistic electromagnetic equations, gamma not required
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sue jahn