Re: Space-time curvature


> > Dear Bill, during past years you have allways been the first with your
> > critics like crackpot, ***, idiot, ignorant etc. Now you say that
you
> > have really read a few paragraphs of the theory, but not until now!

Henry Haapalainen


> I have read it before. One of the reasons you are called a crackpot etc
> (and I usually do not use words like ***) is you seem to have a very
> selective memory about facts (view your denial of posting the message I
gave
> Toms reply to) and a readiness shift the discussion away from what is
> relevant when it gets to the meat of your ideas. The relevant issue here
is
> your claim 'But if there are no rubber bands between the objects, and if
we
> accept that gravity is, after all, not a force, a contradiction arises.'
I
> examined your document and could find no reasoning supporting that
> statement. When I posted such rather than post the exact reasoning and
> where it is contained in the document you simply said it is there and I
give
> up. One can not help but have the word 'evasion' spring to mind and my
> reply reflected that. If you are genuine that is not the tack you would
> have taken - you would have carefully explained your reasoning with quotes
> from your document. The fact you do not take such a course is part of
your
> problem and why you are labeled crackpot.
>
> > Do you expect, that I should take you seriously? You don't want to know
> what I
> > think of you.
>
> My attitude to cranks and crackpots has developed from many years of
posting
> on sci.physics.relativity and has got me into trouble on a number of
> occasions. However if you were to change your attitude and actually
> discuss what is relevant rather than detours to discuss my 'attitude' then
> we can return to what this group is about. Care to provide you exact
> reasoning why you believe 'But if there are no rubber bands between the
> objects, and if we accept that gravity is, after all, not a force, a
> contradiction arises.'?
>
> Bill
>
The sentence you want to be cleared is from a book of fysics. It has nothing
to do with my theory.

Henry Haapalainen


.

Quantcast