Re: Simple Sagnac
- From: dubious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bilge)
- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:45:27 GMT
Dirk Van de moortel:
>The thing that puzzled me, and still does, is that he says
>that both the "classical" u- = k - v and the relativistic
>u- = (k-v)/(1-k v) are 'dragged'. Yet, if we take the case
>where k = 1, the relativistic speed reduces to u- = 1, which
>is something I wouldn't call dragged.
I'm not really sure what ``dragged'' is supposed to mean, either.
>And it's no closing speed either. But again, I might be mistaken.
>Need more from the sideline.
.
- References:
- Re: Simple Sagnac
- From: Bilge
- Re: Simple Sagnac
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Simple Sagnac
- Prev by Date: Re: Relativistic electromagnetic equations, gamma not required
- Next by Date: Re: Simple Sagnac
- Previous by thread: Re: Simple Sagnac
- Next by thread: Re: Simple Sagnac
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|