Re: Light & very small distances - paradox??

rotchm, instantly has nothing to do with no time; it is the least time,
whatever that is.

David, there are no illusions; everything looks like how it's supposed
to. There are only delusions.

Bill, that Planck site is too scatterbrained to explain how to derive
the various Planck units. Try my heap of linked expressions at
http://www.advancedphysics.org/viewthread.php?tid=1585&page=1#pid7925.
My notation even distinguishes between linear and rectangular
exponentiation, which no one carelessly does.

The smallest distance is defined as the equivalence of light's
wavelength to the gravital separation between the mass-energy of that
light. As gravity is the weakest force, and light is the commodity of
endless interaction, the lower limit for light propagation is quite
short. I don't know why Baez is on with that useless "Planck area".
Is he getting another unique vector from it?

-Aut

.