Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.


"Henri Wilson" <H@..> wrote in message news:r6lte1hatgtb78g2o0dqtbto6skpca37om@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 15:59:53 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen"
> <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >sue jahn wrote:
> >> "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dckl9j$fd$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>>Henri Wilson wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Paul, here's an experiment for you to perform.
> >>>>
> >>>>Synch two clocks on the ground. Send one into orbit. Measure its rate from the
> >>>>ground. Leave it there for one month, then bring it back to base.
> >>>>
> >>>>GR says both its reading and rate should be the same as the ground clock.
> >>>>If it is not the same, GR must be wrong.
> >>>>
> >>>>Do you agree?
> >>>
> >>>Your ignorance is obviously incurable,
> >>>so an answer would be futile.
> >>>
> >>>Paul
> >>
> >>
> >> Heni,
> >> That means he agress.
> >> Spoonbenders have a strange mystical language.
> >
> >So you must be as ignorant of GR as Henri.
>
> Paul, we would love to be educated. We are still waiting to hear the actual GR
> explaination of the clock rate increase.

Just do what Andersen does. Divide the rate by
zero and declare it to be whatever you please.

;-)
Sue...

>
> >
> >Paul
>
>
> HW.
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> Sometimes I feel like a complete failure.
> The most useful thing I have ever done is prove Einstein wrong.


.

Quantcast