Re: A funny kind of rectilinearity
- From: shuba <tim.shuba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:33:42 -0500
Mark Adkins got to the point:
> my basic point: the
> mathematical basis for "time dilation" disappears altogether when the
> principle of the relativity of simultaneity is properly (universally)
> applied, that is to say, applied to include (rather than exclude as a
> special case) the clock synchronization procedure.
Say what? Two different frames, say A and B, already have their
own convention to determine simultaneity - that's part of the
definition of an inertial frame in special relativity. Time
dilation is simply the determination by B that A's clock rate,
although lasting exactly one tick per second by A's measurements,
is longer when measured by the clocks in the B frame.
The mathematical basis for time dilation is fairly simple
geometry. In fact, the implications of the underlying geometry
are far more interesting, physically, than all the gee-whiz
stories about twin parodoxes or semantic nonsense about how
clocks are slowed by their velocity. Relativity is fundamentally
about symmetry, and symmetry is described by geometry.
---Tim Shuba---
.
- References:
- A funny kind of rectilinearity
- From: msadkins04
- Re: A funny kind of rectilinearity
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: A funny kind of rectilinearity
- From: msadkins04
- A funny kind of rectilinearity
- Prev by Date: Re: A funny kind of rectilinearity
- Next by Date: Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
- Previous by thread: Re: A funny kind of rectilinearity
- Next by thread: Re: A funny kind of rectilinearity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|