Re: Simple Sagnac

sal <pragmatist@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:pan.2005.08.02.16.50.28.81341@xxxxxxxxxx:

> On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 23:27:17 +0100, Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote:
>
>> sal wrote:
>>> http://www.physicsinsights.org/sagnac_1.html
>>
>> This is an excellent page. I didn't understood the Sagnac effect
>> before, and now I do.
>
> Thanks for the comment -- I'm glad it helped. That's how I felt about
> it, too, when figures 3, 4, and 5 occurred to me. (All the words were
> added a lot later.)

I have been working my way through the other pages on your site.
Very good.




--
bz

please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.

bz+sp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Odd behavior of a Single Photon
    ... infinite set. ... bz+sp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The true crackpots
    ... Are you SURE that your algebra is correct? ... infinite set. ... bz+sp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Electromagnets Get "Tired"?
    ... were you trying to ask me about LSU? ... infinite set. ... bz+sp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Is c really constant in a strong grav field?
    ... > SR demands the speed of light to be a universal constant. ... infinite set. ... bz+sp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Simple Sagnac
    ... > Here's a simple view of the Sagnac effect: ... infinite set. ... bz+sp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)