Re: Time is absolut
- From: "sue jahn" <susysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 15:42:39 -0400
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dobfs2-bt7.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In sci.physics.relativity, kenseto
> <kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote
> on Sat, 06 Aug 2005 15:23:44 GMT
> <4C4Je.49791$zY4.3756@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > "TomGee" <lvlus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1123283008.666989.66450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> HH, not according to the SR resolution to the Twin Paradox where speed
> >> makes all the difference in the world as to the rate of the passage of
> >> time for each twin..
> >>
> >
> > That's because SRians define time as what the clock measures. There is no
> > twin paradox when absolute time is used to define time. In that case a clock
> > second will contain a different amount of absolute time in different frames.
> >
>
> Correct! Of course...whose clock would be used for the
> absolute time def?
Unless you believe in free lunches try one that satisfies
K = 1/2 mv^2
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Energy.html
Or just synchronize spatially separate points with a bag
of marbles and two equal lengths of garden hose.
It is really hard for deranged theorists to steal the marbles
because they are not allowed access to sharp objects.
Sue...
>
> --
> #191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time is absolut
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Time is absolut
- References:
- Time is absolut
- From: Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Time is absolut
- From: AllYou!
- Re: Time is absolut
- From: Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Time is absolut
- From: TomGee
- Re: Time is absolut
- From: kenseto
- Re: Time is absolut
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Time is absolut
- Prev by Date: Re: Why Sagnac disproves Special Relativity.
- Next by Date: Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
- Previous by thread: Re: Time is absolut
- Next by thread: Re: Time is absolut
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|