Re: Twin paradox invalidated

Henry, you do not understand the TP at all. It is not that one is
stationary while the other is moving that causes the time dilation
effect. That is what some have said, but as you so aptly point out to
them, if it caused it on Earth it should cause it way out there too.

As I pointed out to you and others on your other thread, the so-called
paradox is explained by my contention that it is the difference in
speeds between the twins that causes the time disparity. Nothing else
works right to clear up all these little loose ends.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: TIME FLOW
    ... examining Doppler time we find it has none of these deficiencies. ... therefore conclude that the erroneous concept of time dilation be ... source -- Einstein's paper,On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. ... observations of these clocks will show a variation ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR time dilation on remote objects ?
    ... >>and the source was moving. ... as long as one uses Galilean relativity ... And since cosmology is *described* by GR, ... You talked about a time dilation "caused" by the motion above. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Search for Higgs Boson not dangerous.
    ... it seems that objects are moving more ... You must have seen my postings looking at ways to show how time dilation ... The theory predicts that if we were to have 2 cubes 1 cm diameter placed ... Do note that our co moving observers will now measure their 1 cm by 1/2 ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Circular motion in SR
    ... distance contraction exists, ... combine the effects of time dilation and distance contraction together ...  S is not moving. ... frame you cannot specify. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Circular motion in SR
    ... distance contraction exists, ... combine the effects of time dilation and distance contraction together ...  S is not moving. ... frame you cannot specify. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)