Re: Time is absolut
- From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 04:00:09 GMT
In sci.physics.relativity, sue jahn
<susysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Sat, 6 Aug 2005 15:42:39 -0400
<42f516d3$0$18645$14726298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dobfs2-bt7.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> In sci.physics.relativity, kenseto
>> <kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote
>> on Sat, 06 Aug 2005 15:23:44 GMT
>> <4C4Je.49791$zY4.3756@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> >
>> > "TomGee" <lvlus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:1123283008.666989.66450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> HH, not according to the SR resolution to the Twin Paradox where speed
>> >> makes all the difference in the world as to the rate of the passage of
>> >> time for each twin..
>> >>
>> >
>> > That's because SRians define time as what the clock measures.
>> > There is no twin paradox when absolute time is used to define
>> > time. In that case a clock second will contain a different
>> > amount of absolute time in different frames.
>> >
>>
>> Correct! Of course...whose clock would be used for the
>> absolute time def?
>
> Unless you believe in free lunches try one that satisfies
> K = 1/2 mv^2
> http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Energy.html
K = m c^2 - m_0 c^2 = 1/2 m_0 v^2 + 3/8 m_0 v^4/c^2
+ 5/16 m_0 v^6/c^4 +...
There's also an odd error in the derivation of (11) from (10).
Since m = 0, the values p^2/2m and hbar^2 k^2/2m have no meaning.
In fact as written the equation makes the odd claim that
p^2/2m = pc
or p = 2mc = E/c.
This is not quite consistent.
One might claim is that m_0 of a photon is zero
(since photons are never at rest); since m = gamma m_0
and gamma for a photon is infinite (1/sqrt(1-c^2/c^2)),
a special case can be made available. Therefore
m = 2E/c^2 is reasonable, although it's not clear if it's
actual mass, as opposed to an abstract formula. However,
that doesn't reconcile with (8) or (9), either.
Ick.
>
> Or just synchronize spatially separate points with a bag
> of marbles and two equal lengths of garden hose.
> It is really hard for deranged theorists to steal the marbles
> because they are not allowed access to sharp objects.
>
> Sue...
But what if they lose them?
[.sigsnip]
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time is absolut
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Time is absolut
- References:
- Time is absolut
- From: Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Time is absolut
- From: AllYou!
- Re: Time is absolut
- From: Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Time is absolut
- From: TomGee
- Re: Time is absolut
- From: kenseto
- Re: Time is absolut
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Time is absolut
- From: sue jahn
- Time is absolut
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple Sagnac
- Next by Date: Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
- Previous by thread: Re: Time is absolut
- Next by thread: Re: Time is absolut
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|