Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: "sue jahn" <susysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 05:01:13 -0400
"SDaryl" <stevendaryl3016@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1123467787.415497.20600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> sue jahn wrote:
> > > It doesn't matter. Relativity applies to all clocks, regardless of how
> > > they are manufactured. The only constraint is that the clocks must be
> > > self-contained. So sun-dials (which depend on the sun) are excluded,
> > > but wind-up clocks, atomic clocks, piezoelectric clocks are all
> > > covered.
> >
> > That is right. And only one prediction can apply to all those varities.
> > They are unaffected by uniform motion in Euclidean space.
>
> The prediction made by SR is that any
You are parroting nonsese.
Sue...
clock (windup, piezoelectric,
> etc.) will show an elapsed time given by
>
> T = integral of square-root(1-(v/c)^2) dt
>
> (where v and t are measured in any inertial coordinate system).
>
> --
> Daryl McCullough
> Ithaca, NY
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: SDaryl
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- References:
- Twin paradox invalidated
- From: Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: SDaryl
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: SDaryl
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: SDaryl
- Twin paradox invalidated
- Prev by Date: Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- Next by Date: Re: Annotated Einstein Clock
- Previous by thread: Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- Next by thread: Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|