Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 16:09:50 GMT
"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dd7rfm$2r3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Androcles wrote:
| > Ptolemy's geocentric universe lasted 1400 years and wasn't "true";
|
| But it did not disagree with observations.
Very true.... almost. Actually Copernicus believed the orbits were
circles.
http://webexhibits.org/calendars/year-text-Galileo.html
The science of astronomy didn't advance without Kepler,
http://www.akiti.ca/KeplerEquation.html
when more careful observations were made, and it cannot proceed
until Hulse and Taylor are officially debunked.
See "On the back of an envelope".
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/ae398866ecc0bf69/b3d67d40323c5e58?lnk=st&q=Androcles+%22back+of+an+envelope%22+group:sci.physics.relativity&rnum=1&hl=en#b3d67d40323c5e58
| As I said, if SR did not conform to observations, it would have
vanished
| long ago.
SR should have vanished with Sagnac, SR doesn't conform to
observation.
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/43ef355d412abc00/ec05c9365f4dd404?lnk=st&q=Sagnac+Androcles&rnum=1&hl=en#ec05c9365f4dd404
I accuse Einstein of the same crime Newton accused Ptolemy of,
and I accuse you along with him.
"The most recent accusations of forgery made against Ptolemy came from
Newton in [12]. He begins this book by stating clearly his views:-
This is the story of a scientific crime. ... I mean a crime committed by
a scientist against fellow scientists and scholars, a betrayal of the
ethics and integrity of his profession that has forever deprived mankind
of fundamental information about an important area of astronomy and
history.
Towards the end Newton, having claimed to prove every observation
claimed by Ptolemy in the Almagest was fabricated, writes [12]:-
[Ptolemy] developed certain astronomical theories and discovered that
they were not consistent with observation. Instead of abandoning the
theories, he deliberately fabricated observations from the theories so
that he could claim that the observations prove the validity of his
theories. In every scientific or scholarly setting known, this practice
is called fraud, and it is a crime against science and scholarship. "
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Ptolemy.html
Draper once said:
"I had high hopes -- really -- that perhaps one misguided soul would
read something sensible and say, "Oh... Really?...Oh. I see I was
confused. OK, I get it now. Now what about...?" My head knew better,
my heart does not.
[sitting in the duck blind, waiting with a shotgun for a duck to
appear]
PD"
The duck has shot Draper.
Androcles.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- References:
- Twin paradox invalidated
- From: Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: Androcles
- Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- From: Tom Roberts
- Twin paradox invalidated
- Prev by Date: Re: Imaginary Space (secular version)
- Next by Date: Re: Special relativistic equivalence principle
- Previous by thread: Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- Next by thread: Re: Twin paradox invalidated
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|