Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.


"Henri Wilson" <H@..> wrote in message
news:k57mf19b9k2n3hk1l7aiaur0idm4efgavc@xxxxxxxxxx
| On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:52:15 GMT, "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org>
wrote:
|
| >
| >"Henri Wilson" <H@..> wrote in message
| >news:pa1lf1h3l0tnj4i4om9l4486l9qqjmcs92@xxxxxxxxxx
| >| On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:12:11 GMT, "Androcles" <Androcles@
MyPlace.org>
| >wrote:
|
| >| >Henri has a computer model created now, he can
| >| >suddenly change the direction of the wave and look
| >| >at the waveform's phase.
| >|
| >| It does.
| >|
| >| But it is YOUR program A. I just added the random phase bit.
| >|
| >| Andersen doesn't understand that two waves traveling in the same
| >diorection but
| >| 180 out of phase will cancel.
| >
| >I know, that's why I farted uncontrollably as I rolled on the floor
| >with tears of laughter. There is only me and the cat here anyway
| >and he wanted to go out. I opened the window for him, and he
| >took advantage of it. I took advantage of the breeze.
| >Damn, I wish you'd program E = M-e.sin(E) instead of being
| >so stubborn.
|
| I dont know how to program E = M-e.sin(E).
| It doesn't make much sense. Nor does it produce an ellipse.

I posted it. You didn't read it.
So that you understand it, go to the diagram at

http://www.akiti.ca/KeplerEquation.html

Now, see the angles at E and M (badly hand-written), E at the centre and
M at the focus, f.
They are very different, right? M is greater than a right angle, E is
less.
The interval of TIME for the angle E is the same interval of TIME
for the angle M.

Because we want equal times, we compute E from M and
that will give us the x-coordinate of P as semi-major-axis * cos(E)
and the y-coordinate as semi-minor-axis * sin(E) (near as makes
no difference, it isn't quite exact.)

Private Sub Form_Kepler(M)

R=0
E= M
While (abs(R-E) > 0.0001)
E=R
R = M - ecc*sin(E)
Wend
RETURN E.
End Sub


|
| >| Tha's is why he cannot understand that the two stars that make up
the
| >binary
| >| HD87105 (or whatever) also almost cancel each other's brightness
| >variation
| >| curves.
| >
| >I know... That's why I programmed a single light source.
| >I could easily have programmed two sources but I wanted an
| >educational aid, not a simulation of a real system.
| >That's up to you and other students to do and get accolades for.
| >You might even win a Nobel prize. Hulse and Taylor did by
| >using GR and a pulsar, but you have no chance without Kepler's
| >equation, so program the ellipse correctly.
| > Do your fucking homework, quit teaching morons like bz
| >how to think and boasting how you proved Einstein wrong,
| >you did not.
| >I did.
|
| I did many times.... see my programs.
|
| >My work is all this newsgroup and has been since before you
| >arrived on the scene.
|
| have a beer A.
|
|
| >
| >You don't have to be, I'll help, as I'll help anyone.
| >
| >| The most useful thing I have ever done is prove Einstein wrong.
| >
| >You didn't.
| >Sagnac did, in 1913. I interpreted the data in 2005.
|
| Tell George Dishman about it then.
|
| >
| >There are others before me
| >[1] R.B. Driscoll, "Sagnac's Experiment Misdescribed," Galilean
| >Electrodynamics ..
| >
| >[2] Fox, J.G., Am J Phys, "Evidence Against Emission Theories," 33,
| >1-17, (1965)
| >
| >[3] J.P. Wesley, "The Sagnac Effect: Renshaw vs. Driscoll," Galilean
| >Electrodynamics 8, 86 (1997)
| >
| >Not all want to claim accolades.
| >Some are interested in physics for it's own sake.
| >Quit messing with bz, he can't teach you anything, and do your
fucking
| >homework.
|
| Bob likes wasting our time. It is OK for him, he is at work....getting
paid.
|
| I produce beautiful ellpses A. You cannot deny that.

They are not ellipses, they are half spirals.
|
| >Androcles
| >
| >
|
|
| HW.
| www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
|
| Sometimes I feel like a complete failure.
| The most useful thing I have ever done is prove Einstein wrong.

.

Loading