Re: OWLS is not equal to c


"Henri Wilson" <H@..> wrote in message
news:5vjnf1hrmgh1lm5hnpp1ueqlvo85s9fkcj@xxxxxxxxxx
| On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:18:18 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen"
| <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
| >Henri Wilson wrote:
| >> On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:21:33 +0100, "George Dishman"
<george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| >> wrote:
| >>
|
| >>>Then why don't you show me the curves you
| >>>get and the parameters required to achieve
| >>>it. I will be happy to admit you have some
| >>>successes when I see them.
| >
| >I suspect you know the reason, George. :-)
| >
| >The ballistic theory predicts that HD80715
| >should be a variable. It isn't.
| >
| >> Firstly it is very hard to obtain the rquired data....much of which
is highly
| >> suspect anyway.
| >
| >The fact is that I supplied all the required data.
| >
| >But the answer is interesting, and typical for Henri Wilson.
| >Henri says he has calculated the light curve for HD80715
| >and must thus have had all the required data.
| >But he won't show the result, because the required
| >data are hard to get. And the data that are hard to get
| >are suspect anyway - they are only measured data.
| >
| >> Secondly, the fact that the typical curve sha[es can be produced is
suficient
| >> reason to accept that most variable star curves are a direct
consequence of
| >> c+v.
| >
| >In other words, it doesn't matter that the predictions of
| >the ballistic theory are wrong for a concrete binary with
| >measured data, if Henri can dream up (in most cases physically
| >impossible) data for a fantasy binary that will make the ballistic
| >theory produce the observed light curve.
| >
| >Henry can infer what the parameters of the binary must be
| >from the light curve, and the inferred data are not suspect.
| >How can they be wrong?
|
| Is this the same Paul Andersen who doesn't know that Asin(xt)
+Asin(xt+180) =
| 0?

Yep. The same Paul Andersen that can't figure out v = x/t,
Where x = 100000m and t = 2.2 microseconds, the life of a muon.
He thinks you have to slow the muon down with a scintillator to
measure its speed to make sure it is less than c.

|
| >So he is inferring that a cepheid really is orbiting
| >a 100+ solar masses invisible star.
| >(Not a black hole - they don't exist in Henri's world!)
|
| This new category of star is called the WCH (Wilson, Cool, Heavy).
| Pass it on....
Does the Paul Andersen that can't figure out v = x/t or
Asin(xt) +Asin(xt+180) = 0 have some black holes in his world?
Not surprising, I suppose. Observation means nothing to him. If
he can dream it then it exists.
What I'd like to know though is why a Wilson Can't Hack thinks he
needs a star that isn't in a tiny orbit at the focus of a 1/2 spiral?
|
| >
| >> Thirdly, I am still trying to work on important aspects of the
program but
| >> cannot get on with it becaus I spend too much time trying to
educate people
| >> like you.

You got that right, and Andersen is ineducable. He still can't figure v
= x/t.



| >In other words, Henri's program doesn't produce the desired result,
| >and he is unable to find a way to make it do so.
Andersen cannot produce the desired result of x/t, so he slows the muon
with a scintillator.
Henri's program cannot reproduce an ellipse. Henri needs 20 or so lines
of code replaced. Not a big deal, but it will make an enormous
difference.


| This IS the same Paul Andersen who doesn't believe that light moves at
c wrt
| its source. Instead, all starlight in the universe moves at c wrt
little planet
| Earth.
| ........The fairies are reponsible, you know :)

Yes, of course.
So neither of you gave the other any clear signal to read, the posts
were
to raise the general noise level of the newsgroup.

Androcles.





.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast