Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0


"Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1123922241.18813.2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Bill Hobba" <rubbish@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:KvbLe.82142$oJ.14622@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> |
> | "Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | news:1123841404.20463.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | >
> | > "Bill Hobba" <rubbish@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | > news:KNZKe.81693$oJ.14989@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > |
> | > | "Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | > | news:1123833381.17440.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > | > The top singularity is the outer one showing a compress time and
> | > expanded
> | > | > space character and the bottom inner ones showing a compressed
> space
> | > and
> | > | > expanded time identity. The compressed time in the outer cosmic
> | > | > singularity
> | > | > is relatively far slower than the expanded time in the inner local
> | > ones.
> | > | >
> Relative Space
> <shorter | longer>
>
> Singularity>|/ distance | | Tending to negative,
> | /| /\ Vacuum | less mass effect and
> Positron >| / c| < density | antiparticles
> Radiation >|c | / | \/ state | /\
> Electron >| /| | Less Energy | More Energy
> Proton >| / | /\ Particle | \/
> Neutron >| / | < density | Tending to positive,
> Singularity>|/ | \/ state | more mass effect and
> | duration /| | particles
>
> <faster | slower>
> Relative Time
> | > | >
> | > | > Intrinsic\stationary energy\mass\velocity being the sum of the
> | > | > differences
> | > | > in space\time ratios in any given point or area in all vectors.
> | > |
> | > | Please explain what you mean by 'Intrinsic\stationary
> | > | energy\mass\velocity' - eg stationary velocity is a contradiction is
> | > terms.
> | > | It is things like the above that make people respond that you are
> simply
> | > | posting a word salad. If you want them not to think so then please
> | > provide
> | > | more detail.
> | > |
> | > | Bill
> | >
> | > Thanks for the reply Bill what I mean is the intrinsic motion effect
> | > contained in any point of space/time, its frequently seen as a
> particles
> | > wave function,eigenfunction,eigenvalues,mass or a vacuum state I
> believe
> | > although the translation is not exact. i.e particles can be seen as
> | > stationary from some pov but if you bust their stationary state there
> | > intrinsic velocity\mass is then expressed as energy in motion.
> | >
> | > Hope this helps and is clear.
> |
> | Yes is is perfectly clear now. You are simply throwing buzzwords
> together.

Anyone with an actual brain that reads your incoherent cobbled together
collection of buzzwords you obviously do not understand would reach a
different conclusion. Want to prove me wrong? Tell me what a wavefunction
is. I will even give you a reference where the answer can be found - page
80 - Dirac Principles of QM.

Bill

> | Dirk is spot on - Asking an idiot to explain what he means, usually
> makes
> | it worse. Asking a malicious idiot to explain what he means, always
> makes
> it
> | worse.'
> |
> | Bill
>
> You and Dirk are pathetic and for all to see which you and he are too
> pathetic to see.
> Grow younger so that you can perhaps begin to see yourselves as others do.
> Go and play with yourselves and each other and stop posting your pathetic
> trolling and cliché physics posts to my thread untill you are younger
> {:-).
>
> |
> | >
> | > |
> | > | >
> | > | > Introduced\kinetic energy\mass\velocity being the sum of the
> | > differences
> | > | > in
> | > | > space\time ratios in any given point or area in a
> | > | > specific vector.
> | > | >
> | > | > Fields as introduced space/time ratio gradient effects by particle
> | > energy
> | > | > and polarity states. Field do not move except as a result of there
> | > source
> | > | > motion but they may cause the effect of motion in other
> | > | > condensed\particle
> | > | > states.
> | > | > --
> | > | > Significant Zero E-field = Electric field, M-field =Magnetic
> field,
> | > two
> | > | > unbound field effects
> | > | > http://home.freeuk.com/paulps/
> | > | > Maybe updates. (1-(1/(1/3))^2)/(1 + (1/(1/3))^2) = - 0.08 = FTL
> | > ? -p<+p
> | > | > or
> | > | > (m*-v)<(m*+v) or (m*-c^2)<(m*+c^2) =g?
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > |
> | > |
> | >
> | >
> |
> |
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
    ... |> Thanks for the reply Bill what I mean is the intrinsic motion effect ... Asking a malicious idiot to explain what he means, ... You and Dirk are pathetic and for all to see which you and he are too ... Grow younger so that you can perhaps begin to see yourselves as others do. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Space/Time/Energy characteristics 0
    ... >> |> Thanks for the reply Bill what I mean is the intrinsic motion effect ... i.e particles can be seen as ... Asking a malicious idiot to explain what he means, ... >> Grow younger so that you can perhaps begin to see yourselves as others ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Favorite Magic Song
    ... their summer clothes, who I do see as being younger than Bill (Billy, ... girls in their summer clothes? ... because it does make sense in a linear way, but the whole song is ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)
  • Re: Dayton Millers Data have no Real Signal
    ... >>> See, Bill, these ether cranks really stick together, but don't let ... >> Nothing around here scares me off Dirk. ... Since posting here I have changed mine on a number of issues ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Dayton Millers Data have no Real Signal
    ... > Dirk Van de moortel wrote: ... >>> Present your proof the Peter is Cahill Hobba! ... >>> proof that Peter is Cahill, you now owe him an apology. ... > You write as if Bill is a newbe. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)