Re: Spacetime radiation (kst).
- From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 21:01:07 GMT
"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1124602476.011405.151260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Using an Infinite number of derivatives,
>
> wrt "x" applied to any function results in the factors,
> (apart from 0),
>
> 1) de^x = e^x , ((stable))
>
> (e = expotential)
>
> AND/OR
>
> 2) d^4 sin x = sin x, ((cyclic))
>
> IMO, physically (1) is the g-field and (2) is the EMR bath
> we inhabit within light, TV, cell phones...
You have been mixing your medication with alcohol again.
I told you - don't do that.
Dirk Vdm
.
- References:
- Spacetime radiation (kst).
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Spacetime radiation (kst).
- Prev by Date: Re: Twin paradox invalidated 2
- Next by Date: Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED
- Previous by thread: Spacetime radiation (kst).
- Next by thread: Re: Spacetime radiation (kst).
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|