Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT IS A CHANGE IN LIGHT SPEED


"Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dehpog$qbc$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Androcles wrote:
| > "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
| > message news:lirqt2-unm.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | In sci.physics.relativity, Androcles
| > | <Androcles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
| > | wrote
| > | on Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:54:15 GMT
| > | <XVjOe.11182$5m3.6548@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| > | >
| > | > A cepheid is either
| > | > 1) A specialized puff-puff star because Einstein decreed
| > | > the speed of light invariant.
| > | > 2) An ordinary star with a planet.
| > | > 3) Something else.
| > | >
| > | > Heard of Ockham's Razor?
| > |
| > | I've heard of it. Care to explain how a star with a planet
| > | would change the luminosity *and spectrum* of the star,
| > | as observed here?
| >
| > It does no good to talk about the bright green flying elephant's
| > eggs at the bottom of a black hole.
| > Produce your evidence and we'll look at it together, ok?
|
| Would it not be more reasonable that YOU produced the evidence
| showing that a star with a planet would change the spectrum as
observed?
|
| Take for example delta Cephei.
| The spectrum changes from a F2 to a G3 spectrum during the period.
| (I will not insult you by explaining what an F2 and a G3 spectrum is.)

If you want to *** in, half-...err..dim-...err...nit-...err phuckwit
you
should explain it for Ghost's benefit.

| http://www.cosmovisions.com/cep01.htm

I don't see a spectrum, phuckwit, I see some reduced data. A spectrum
looks like this:
http://www.colorado.edu/physics/2000/quantumzone/





| Or maybe you prefer to explain the spectrum of RR Lyrae?

Don't change the subject, phuckwit. I've show SR to be flawed
mathemtically, Sagnac shows it physically, your precious theory was
still-born and has been kept on life-support for 100 years, it's time
to quit grieving and let it die. The velocity of light in space is c+v,
learn to live with it.
Even your own dumb phuckwittery,

"That is, we can reverse the directions of the frames
which is the same as interchanging the frames,
which - as I have told you a LOT of times,
OBVIOUSLY will lead to the transform:
t = (tau-xi*v/c^2)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
x = (xi - v*tau)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
or:
tau = (t+xv/c^2)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
xi = (x + vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)" -Paul B. Andersen

and Einstein's
"But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k,
when measured in the stationary system, with the velocity c-v..."

is enough to tell anybody it is c+v.

Stupidly clinging to a dumb definition

"we establish by definition that the "time" required by light to travel
from A to B equals the "time" it requires to travel from B to A. "

is all you are doing.




| Its spectrum changes from a B8 spectrum to an F2 spectrum.
|
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1916ApJ....43..217S&amp;data_type=PDF_HIGH&amp;type=PRINTER&amp;filetype=.pdf
|
| Remember that It does no good to talk about the bright green
| flying elephant's eggs at the bottom of a black hole.
| Produce your evidence showing that a star with a planet would change
| the spectrum as observed, and we'll look at it together, ok?
|
| Paul

You had ample opportunity to download my program when I had it up
on a web page, I see no reason to cast pearls before swine.

Now you'll have to wait until I've finished my paper, phuckwit.

Androcles.

.

Quantcast