Re: charged black hole metric


"JanPB" <filmart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1124932580.706893.124450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
| >
| > Jan, that is probably a close as you will get at this stage.
| > You really deserve a genuine Androcles Pseudo *Plonk* though.
| > Next time try just a wee bit harder ;-)
|
| It was interesting to find out how far he could be pushed into
| irrelevancies and nonsense. His differentiability "objection" reminded
| me of Plutonium (does he still exist?) who once claimed on sci.math
| that the 3-color map problem solution by Haken et al. was incorrect
| because... it didn't consider the boundary lines separating the map
| regions.
|
| --
| Jan Bielawski
|
That phuckwit is so stupid he doesn't realise that given the number of
posts I reply to, I wouldn't have time to read his *** anyway. I have
to be selective, dumping the religious Hammond maniacs as well.
Maybe he thinks kill-files don't exist, or that anything he says is
so important I'd read it.
I'd read George Hammond before I'd read moortel.
Androcles.


.

Loading