Re: time dilation

thanks, henry. i am new in this newsgroup. i have also been a relativity
enthusiast. the reason i join this newsgroup is to discuss ideas about
relativity, physics, and speculate on anything that might be relevant to
physics. if i am wrong, it would be nice to receive constructive criticism
from someone who really knows in order to understand. i will try to do the
same. there is a well organized physics forum in
http://www.physicsforums.com/

francisco

"Henry Haapalainen" <kirppu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:devu65$lo2$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "francisco" <paco1955@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> kirjoitti viestissä
> news:krrQe.413$Kk1.317@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> the pion is a particle that can be created in a high-energy particle
>> accelerator. it is a very unstable particle; pions created at rest are
>> observed to decay (to other particles) with an average lifetime of only
> 26.0
>> ns [26.0E(-9)]. in one particular experiment, pions were created in
>> motion
>> at a speed of v = 0.913c (where c is the speed of light, 3.00E8 m/s). in
>> this case they were observed to travel in the laboratory an average
> distance
>> of D = 17.4 m before decaying, from which they decay in a time given by
> D/v
>> = 63.7 ns. this effect, called time dilation, suggest that something
>> about
>> the relative motion between the pion and the laboratory has stretched the
>> measured time interval by a factor of about 2.5. this experiment reveals
> the
>> limitations of classical physics and serve as a test of einstein's
>> special
>> theory of relativity
>>
>
> "Francisco", I understand what you are trying to say, and you are
> absolutely
> right. But for many of these people relativity is a religion, and you
> cannot
> change their mind with any scientific argument. In my theory I say it like
> this:
>
> http://www.wakkanet.fi/~fields/ paragraph A11
>
> A11
> In relativity theory, time has been made a varying quantity like weight
> and
> distance. This assumption is still unsupported by any research result.
> Relativity theory's most enthusiastic supporters believe that there should
> be a mass of evidence - but there is none. There are only
> misunderstandings
> of how an atomic clock operates (the effect of acceleration), and
> misunderstandings of what objective research demands. In many cases,
> attempts have been made to use the theory to prove itself.
>
> Henry Haapalainen
>
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Special relativity passes key test
    ... Special Relativity was confirmed years ago. ... It is essential in the design of high energy particle ... But a common synchrotron accelerator is a place in our own ... The starting point for understanding physics is a really good Physics ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Article: A Century of Einstein
    ... physics ideas, ... rotation between yourself and the stars. ... I know that its common for people trying to state Mach's Principle so ... rather than "absolute relativity". ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Article: A Century of Einstein
    ... physics ideas, ... rotation between yourself and the stars. ... I know that its common for people trying to state Mach's Principle so ... rather than "absolute relativity". ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Newbie Q: Can I move at c?
    ... Einstein addressed the twin paradox in special relativity ... principle formulated originally for physics in empty ... nearby matter and particle accelerators don't exceed c wrt ... For the matter to have some effect on our ultimate speed ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Article: A Century of Einstein
    ... >> theory can't then obey the principle of relativity in its most extreme ... Ever heard of a high-energy particle physics experiment where they ... experiment therefore proves that lightbeam geometry in the core of a ...
    (sci.physics)