sci.physics.relativity

• Date Index

---

• "The Paradox of Zeno", Llup
• Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Tom Roberts
• South pole is melting, Josef Matz
  • Re: South pole is melting, Tom Roberts
    • Re: South pole is melting, Josef Matz
• Re: Dumb(Probably obvious) Light Speed Question, Sue...
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dumb(Probably obvious) Light Speed Question, Sue...
  • Re: Dumb(Probably obvious) Light Speed Question, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Dumb(Probably obvious) Light Speed Question, Dirk Van de moortel
• Bookmaking GP-B, Sue...
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG., The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG., Androcles
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG., Androcles
• c is time dependent !, Josef Matz
  • Re: c is time dependent !, brian a m stuckless
  • Re: c is time dependent !, Bill Hobba
  • Re: c is time dependent !, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: c is time dependent !, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: c is time dependent !, Josef Matz
• Seem to be in a temporal annomily - wobble, Zesljczeques Bris
• Need help with a paper, Deon Joubert
  • Re: Need help with a paper, Deon Joubert
• Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show, warded8
  • Re: Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show, Androcles
    • Re: Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show, Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show, warded8
• Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, sue jahn
  • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Androcles
    • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Sue...
      • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Androcles
      • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Sue...
      • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Androcles
  • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Russell
    • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Russell
      • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Sue...
      • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Androcles
      • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Sue...
      • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Androcles
      • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Sue...
      • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Androcles
      • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Sue...
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles, Sue...
• Re: Lorentz Transformation of force, Perspicacious
• "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", Retic
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", Retic
• Ligo question, jack
• Paradox in need of resolution., RP
  • Re: Paradox in need of resolution., russell
  • Re: Paradox in need of resolution., Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Paradox in need of resolution., RP
    • Message not available
      • Re: Paradox in need of resolution., RP
      • Re: Paradox in need of resolution., wespe
  • Re: Paradox in need of resolution., Tom Roberts
    • Message not available
      • Re: Paradox in need of resolution., Tom Roberts
  • Message not available
    • Re: Paradox in need of resolution., RP
• Pioneer 10: two solutions redshift or blueshift, John C . Polasek
  • Re: Pioneer 10: two solutions redshift or blueshift, Harry
• Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?, sue jahn
  • Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?, Androcles
    • Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?, sue jahn
      • Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?, Androcles
      • Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?, sue jahn
      • Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?, Androcles
• "Retic Postings and SPAM", Retic
  • Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", Pmb
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?, Sue...
  • Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?, Sue...
      • Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?, Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?, AllYou!
      • Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?, Androcles
    • Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?, Mike
      • Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?, Androcles
  • Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?, Bill Hobba
  • Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?, Tom Roberts
  • Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?, xxein
• Psychiatric Help for Older Adults 69.108.172.162, sue jahn
  • Re: Psychiatric Help for Older Adults 69.108.172.162, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Sue...
  • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Deon Joubert
    • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Sue...
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, kenseto
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, PD
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, kenseto
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, PD
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, TomGee
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, kenseto
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Brit
    • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Sue...
  • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Deon Joubert
    • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Sue...
    • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Paul Cardinale
  • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Harry
    • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Deon Joubert
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Sue...
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Harry
  • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, kenseto
  • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Sue...
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Androcles
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, TomGee
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Androcles
      • Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?, Daniel Weston
      • Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?, Androcles
      • Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?, shuba
      • Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?, jem
      • Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?, Harry
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, TomGee
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Sue...
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, TomGee
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Sue...
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Sue...
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Androcles
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Androcles
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, TomGee
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Androcles
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Deon Joubert
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, TomGee
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, TomGee
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, stephen
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, PD
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, TomGee
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Mike
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, jem
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Mike
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Sue...
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Androcles
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, TomGee
  • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, tedrey
    • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Mike
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, russell
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Mike
    • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, russell
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, tedrey
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, russell
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Daniel Weston
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Androcles
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, shuba
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Androcles
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Deon Joubert
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Sue...
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Harry
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, tedrey
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, russell
    • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, jem
    • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Paul Cardinale
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, TomGee
  • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Perspicacious
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Sue...
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, bz
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Perspicacious
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Perspicacious
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Perspicacious
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Bilge
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, PD
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Perspicacious
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Bilge
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, jem
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Perspicacious
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, jem
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, YBM
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Deon Joubert
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, TomGee
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Daniel Weston
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Bilge
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Sue...
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, kenseto
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Harry
  • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, JanPB
    • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Androcles
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?, Androcles
• Advice requested, RP
  • Re: Advice requested, RP
  • Re: Advice requested, wespe
  • Re: Advice requested, Sue...
  • Re: Advice requested, Tom Roberts
    • Message not available
      • Re: Advice requested, wespe
    • Message not available
      • Re: Advice requested, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Advice requested, Paul Cardinale
    • Message not available
      • Re: Advice requested, Paul Cardinale
  • Re: Advice requested, Kees Roos
  • Message not available
    • Re: Advice requested, RP
      • Re: Advice requested, wespe
      • Re: Advice requested, RP
• Words of advice rerquested, RP
  • Re: Words of advice rerquested, Tom Roberts
• Re: Weird Wavelength, John C . Polasek
  • Re: Weird Wavelength, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Weird Wavelength, John C . Polasek
• Re: Hawking on Horizon, Paul B. Andersen
• "A Snapshot of a Photon", Ypoc
  • Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon", Deon Joubert
    • Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon", Androcles
• Re: What if we (human) can never understand the nature?, George Hammond
• Thread From Hell, Gary Eickmeier
  • Re: Thread From Hell, Gary Eickmeier
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy", Einsteinhoax
• Re: Error in BHOT?, xxein
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Tom Roberts
  • Message not available
    • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Bill Hobba
  • Message not available
    • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Mike
    • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Mike
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Daniel Weston
    • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Perspicacious
    • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Bilge
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Perspicacious
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, jem
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Bilge
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Perspicacious
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Bilge
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Perspicacious
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Bilge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Perspicacious
    • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Androcles
  • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, THE GRAND UNIFIED THEORY
  • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Peter M. Brown
  • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Bilge
    • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Bill Hobba
  • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Burgerman
  • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, jem
  • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, PD
    • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Daniel Weston
    • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Androcles
    • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, shevek
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, PD
  • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, surrealistic-dream
    • Message not available
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?, PD
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Ypoc
  • Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Bill Hobba
  • Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", JanPB
    • Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", surrealistic-dream
• Phycisists vs phyckwitists, Androcles
  • Re: Phycisists vs phyckwitists, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: On light aberration, Harry
• Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons, Dr Photon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons, Andreas Most
    • Message not available
      • Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons, Andreas Most
      • Message not available
      • Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons, Andreas Most
  • Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons, carlip-nospam
    • Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons, Dr Photon
• NASA'S JOHNSON SPACE CENTER CLOSES DUE TO HURRICANE RITA, sue jahn
• Re: Aethertheory and GUT, shuba
• New paper, may contain a solution to the NuTeV anomaly, Jay R. Yablon
• space, time, mass, energy, Sid Lanier
  • Re: space, time, mass, energy, Harry
    • Re: space, time, mass, energy, Sid Lanier
      • Re: space, time, mass, energy, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: space, time, mass, energy, Sid Lanier
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., Tom Roberts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., Androcles
    • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., Sue...
  • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., Tom Roberts
    • Message not available
      • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., Androcles
    • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., kenseto
      • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., Tom Roberts
      • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., kenseto
      • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., Tom Roberts
      • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., kenseto
      • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., Tom Roberts
      • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., kenseto
      • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., Tom Roberts
  • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., jem
    • Message not available
      • Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks., Tom Roberts
• Henri Wilson's challenge accepted., Androcles
  • Re: Henri Wilson's challenge accepted., androc1es
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Henri Wilson's challenge accepted., David Evens
• On Superluminal Velocities, vergon_enterprises
  • On Zero Velocities, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
  • Re: On Superluminal Velocities, Bilge
• Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Richard Perry
  • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, RP
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, RP
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Koobee Wublee
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Koobee Wublee
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Paul Stowe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Bilge
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Bilge
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Bilge
    • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Koobee Wublee
  • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
    • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, RP
  • Message not available
    • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, RP
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, RP
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, russell
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, jem
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, RP
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, RP
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, jem
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, RP
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, jem
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, jem
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, jem
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, jem
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, RP
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, jem
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Androcles
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, jem
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, RP
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, wespe
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory, Harry
• the nature of reality, science dan
  • Re: the nature of reality, Daniel Weston
• Ken Tucker's teaching methods, Androcles
  • Re: Ken Tucker's teaching methods, Ken S. Tucker
• Re: PLANCK TEMPERATURE Tp, Paul B. Andersen
• Newtons, Einsteins and Hawkings, relativitybeyondeinstein
  • Re: Newtons, Einsteins and Hawkings, Androcles
  • Re: Newtons, Einsteins and Hawkings, Bill Hobba
• What a story !, oriel36
  • Re: What a story !, xxein
• Re: "The Nature of Mass", oriel36
  • Re: "The Nature of Mass", Tom Roberts
• Re: About Einstein's aether, Mike
• Androcles, see some tight code., Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Androcles, see some tight code., Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Androcles, see some tight code., Androcles
      • Re: Androcles, see some tight code., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Androcles, see some tight code., Androcles
  • Re: Androcles, see some tight code., Androcles
• TOM ROBERTS OBSERVES ACCRETION DISC AROUND BLACK HOLE - SPOG, Androcles
  • Re: TOM ROBERTS OBSERVES ACCRETION DISC AROUND BLACK HOLE - SPOG, Eric Gisse
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Gerald L. O'Barr
• The NuTeV Anomaly May be Evidence of Magnetic Monopoles!, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: The NuTeV Anomaly May be Evidence of Magnetic Monopoles!, Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, xxein
  • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Message not available
    • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, MP
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Androcles
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, MP
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Josef Matz
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Tom Roberts
  • Message not available
    • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, carlip-nospam
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Koobee Wublee
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Koobee Wublee
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there, Dirk Van de moortel
• Papers on Model Mechanics, kenseto
  • Re: Papers on Model Mechanics, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Big Bang., Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, Autymn D. C.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, Bilge
    • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, beda pietanza
      • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, Bilge
      • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, beda pietanza
    • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, beda pietanza
  • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, beda pietanza
    • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, Autymn D. C.
      • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, beda pietanza
    • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, Bilge
      • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, beda pietanza
      • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, Bilge
      • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, beda pietanza
      • Message not available
      • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, beda pietanza
  • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, Sue...
    • Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies, beda pietanza
• Question of Time, dseppala
  • Message not available
    • Re: Question of Time, DarkD
      • Re: Question of Time, Paul Cardinale
  • Re: Question of Time, wespe
  • Re: Question of Time, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Question of Time, jem
  • Re: Question of Time, Harry
• Re: the many ether hypothesis, Bill Hobba
  • Message not available
    • Re: the many ether hypothesis, Bill Hobba
      • Re: the many ether hypothesis, beda pietanza
  • Message not available
    • Re: the many ether hypothesis, Bilge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: the many ether hypothesis, Harry
  • Re: the many ether hypothesis, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: the many ether hypothesis, beda pietanza
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Bill Hobba
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Message not available
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, YBM
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Androcles
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Androcles
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Androcles
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Message not available
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Message not available
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Androcles
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?, Androcles
• Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Daniel Weston
  • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Androcles
  • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Tom Roberts
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, JanPB
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, JanPB
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, JanPB
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Androcles
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Androcles
    • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Kim B
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, brian a m stuckless
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Androcles
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Perspicacious
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Bilge
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Androcles
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Androcles
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, brian a m stuckless
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Perspicacious
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, brian a m stuckless
    • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Androcles
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Daryl McCullough
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Perspicacious
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, carlip-nospam
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, carlip-nospam
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Juan R.
    • Message not available
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Gerald L. O'Barr
• Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bill Hobba
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bill Hobba
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, jem
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, jem
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, jem
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, jem
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, jem
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, jem
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, jem
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, jem
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, jem
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, RP
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, RP
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, jem
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, jem
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, jem
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, jem
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Androcles
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
  • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, RP
    • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, RP
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, RP
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, harry
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Harry
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Harry
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, RP
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, harry
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Harry
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, harry
  • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, JanPB
  • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
    • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, jem
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, brian a m stuckless
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Perspicacious
    • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Bilge
      • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations, Harry
• etheristic questions, beda pietanza
  • Re: etheristic questions, Androcles
    • Message not available
      • Re: etheristic questions, Androcles
  • Re: etheristic questions, Bilge
    • Re: etheristic questions, beda pietanza
      • Re: etheristic questions, Bilge
      • Re: etheristic questions, beda pietanza
• O'Barr: Our reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
  • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Harry
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, vanep
    • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Harry
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, RP
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Harry
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, RP
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, RP
  • Message not available
    • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, wespe
      • Message not available
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, russell
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, vanep
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, vanep
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, vanep
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, vanep
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Message not available
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Harry
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, vanep
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Harry
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Ken S. Tucker
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: O'Barr: Our reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids, Paul B. Andersen
  • Message not available
    • Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids, Harry
  • Message not available
    • Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids, Androcles
      • Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids, Eric Gisse
• Newton's from Einstein?, David Cross
  • Re: Newton's from Einstein?, George Hammond
    • Re: Newton's from Einstein?, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Newton's from Einstein?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Newton's from Einstein?, the softrat
• Is Hell exothermic or endothermic?, Len Gaasenbeek
  • Re: Is Hell exothermic or endothermic?, Paul Danaher
  • Re: Is Hell exothermic or endothermic?, xxein
• Please check my solutions, Zinc Potterman
  • Re: Please check my solutions, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
  • Re: Please check my solutions, David Park
• Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, mpc755
  • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
  • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
    • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, mpc755
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Harry
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, mpc755
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Harry
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, mpc755
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Sue...
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, mpc755
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, mpc755
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, mpc755
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, russell
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, russell
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Harry
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Harry
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, brian a m stuckless
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Harry
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, mpc755
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Harry
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, mpc755
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, mpc755
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, mpc755
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, mpc755
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, wespe
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, mpc755
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, bz
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Sue...
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, mpc755
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Harry
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Harry
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, brian a m stuckless
    • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, kenseto
  • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Sue...
    • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Harry
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Harry
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Harry
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Harry
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Harry
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment, Harry
• relative quantum information questions!, junebug
  • Re: relative quantum information questions!, Tom Roberts
    • Re: relative quantum information questions!, junebug
      • Re: relative quantum information questions!, Bill Hobba
• Bile awski the Janitor., Androcles
  • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Daryl McCullough
    • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Bilge
  • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., JanPB
    • Message not available
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., JanPB
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., JanPB
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Androcles
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., JanPB
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Androcles
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., JanPB
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., JanPB
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., JanPB
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Androcles
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., JanPB
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Androcles
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., JanPB
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Androcles
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., JanPB
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bile awski the Janitor., Daryl McCullough
• Horizon on Hawking, Jim O'Reilly
  • Re: Horizon on Hawking, Dave Snead
    • Re: Horizon on Hawking, Jim O'Reilly
• Question for Thomas Smid, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: Question for Thomas Smid, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einsteinhoax responds to Androcles, Androcles
• "Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job!", sue jahn
  • Re: "Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job!", brian a m stuckless
  • Re: "Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job!", Androcles
• The origin of the universe., Len Gaasenbeek
  • Re: The origin of the universe., Len Gaasenbeek
  • Re: The origin of the universe., Androcles
    • Re: The origin of the universe., Len Gaasenbeek
      • Re: The origin of the universe., Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: The origin of the universe., Androcles