sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: South pole is melting
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Llup
• Re: c is time dependent !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: South pole is melting
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Help with tensors (re-post)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: c is time dependent !
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Dumb(Probably obvious) Light Speed Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dumb(Probably obvious) Light Speed Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: jem
• Re: Dumb(Probably obvious) Light Speed Question
  • From: Sue...
• South pole is melting
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Dumb(Probably obvious) Light Speed Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: c is time dependent !
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Bookmaking GP-B
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: c is time dependent !
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: shevek
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Paradox in need of resolution.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe"
  • From: Retic
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?
  • From: Harry
• Re: c is time dependent !
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Pioneer 10: two solutions redshift or blueshift
  • From: Harry
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• c is time dependent !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: jem
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: jem
• Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?
  • From: jem
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Seem to be in a temporal annomily - wobble
  • From: Zesljczeques Bris
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Need help with a paper
  • From: Deon Joubert
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Need help with a paper
  • From: Deon Joubert
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Deon Joubert
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Deon Joubert
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show
  • From: warded8
• Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show
  • From: warded8
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: PD
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: PD
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Paradox in need of resolution.
  • From: RP
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Russell
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Russell
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: PD
• Classical EM Wave Propagation, attn: Androcles
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Paradox in need of resolution.
  • From: wespe
• Re: Paradox in need of resolution.
  • From: RP
• Re: Lorentz Transformation of force
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Paradox in need of resolution.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe"
  • From: Retic
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Paradox in need of resolution.
  • From: RP
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Paradox in need of resolution.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Paradox in need of resolution.
  • From: russell
• Ligo question
  • From: jack
• Paradox in need of resolution.
  • From: RP
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?
  • From: shuba
• Pioneer 10: two solutions redshift or blueshift
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Advice requested
  • From: RP
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: russell
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: PD
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: PD
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: shuba
• Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: russell
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: tedrey
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: tedrey
• Re: Advice requested
  • From: wespe
• Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: stephen
• Re: Advice requested
  • From: RP
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Mike
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: bz
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Harry
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Retic
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: jem
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Deon Joubert
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: jem
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Deon Joubert
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: jem
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: jem
• Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: jem
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: jem
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Harry
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Weird Wavelength
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: russell
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: russell
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Advice requested
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Mike
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: Mike
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Advice requested
  • From: wespe
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: tedrey
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Advice requested
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Weird Wavelength
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Advice requested
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Psychiatric Help for Older Adults 69.108.172.162
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Words of advice rerquested
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Advice requested
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Advice requested
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Deon Joubert
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Deon Joubert
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Psychiatric Help for Older Adults 69.108.172.162
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Advice requested
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Advice requested
  • From: wespe
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Brit
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Harry
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Deon Joubert
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Advice requested
  • From: RP
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Advice requested
  • From: RP
• Words of advice rerquested
  • From: RP
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Weird Wavelength
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Hawking on Horizon
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Burgerman
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Ypoc
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: RP
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: What if we (human) can never understand the nature?
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: RP
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thread From Hell
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Thread From Hell
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Mike
• Re: space, time, mass, energy
  • From: Sid Lanier
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Einsteinhoax
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: jem
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: jem
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: jem
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: jem
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: THE GRAND UNIFIED THEORY
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Error in BHOT?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: RP
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: space, time, mass, energy
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: space, time, mass, energy
  • From: Sid Lanier
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Ypoc
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wilsonian (true, lightless) Relativity....Wilson's Paradox.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: space, time, mass, energy
  • From: Harry
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why lorentz transformation?
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Henri Wilson's challenge accepted.
  • From: David Evens
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: On Superluminal Velocities
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: RP
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: O'Barr: Our reality!
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Phycisists vs phyckwitists
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Phycisists vs phyckwitists
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: On light aberration
  • From: Harry
• Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: jem
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: jem
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Harry
• Re: Henri Wilson's challenge accepted.
  • From: androc1es
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Harry
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Harry
• Re: O'Barr: Our reality!
  • From: Harry
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• NASA'S JOHNSON SPACE CENTER CLOSES DUE TO HURRICANE RITA
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: RP
• Re: Aethertheory and GUT
  • From: shuba
• Re: why lorentz transformation?
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: Androcles
• New paper, may contain a solution to the NuTeV anomaly
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• space, time, mass, energy
  • From: Sid Lanier
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: jem
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: jem
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: jem
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: A New Way To Synchronize Clocks.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: russell
• Henri Wilson's challenge accepted.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• On Zero Velocities
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Theory of Everything
  • From: Don
• Re: O'Barr: Our reality!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Wilsonian (true, lightless) Relativity....Wilson's Paradox.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: RP
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: RP
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: RP
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: RP
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: O'Barr: Our reality!
  • From: vanep
• Re: O'Barr: Our reality!
  • From: vanep
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: wespe
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• On Superluminal Velocities
  • From: vergon_enterprises
• Re: To Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the nature of reality
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: bz
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Question of Time
  • From: Harry
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: bz
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: the many ether hypothesis
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wilsonian (true, lightless) Relativity....Wilson's Paradox.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: Harry
• Re: O'Barr: Our reality!
  • From: Harry
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: RP
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: RP
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: RP
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Richard Perry
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• the nature of reality
  • From: science dan
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: wespe
• Re: Wilsonian (true, lightless) Relativity....Wilson's Paradox.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Wilsonian (true, lightless) Relativity....Wilson's Paradox.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: O'Barr: Our reality!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: What a story !
  • From: xxein
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: mpc755
• Re: the many ether hypothesis
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: harry
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: harry
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: harry
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: mpc755
• Re: etheristic questions
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: bz
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: why lorentz transformation?
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: the many ether hypothesis
  • From: Bilge
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Wilsonian (true, lightless) Relativity....Wilson's Paradox.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: jem
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: jem
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: jem
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Wilsonian (true, lightless) Relativity....Wilson's Paradox.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Ken Tucker's teaching methods
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: Sue...
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Wilsonian (true, lightless) Relativity....Wilson's Paradox.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: wespe
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: etheristic questions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Wilsonian (true, lightless) Relativity....Wilson's Paradox.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: bz
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• For HENRI WILSON - a Wilson Hot Heavy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Newtons, Einsteins and Hawkings
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: etheristic questions
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Ken Tucker's teaching methods
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: PLANCK TEMPERATURE Tp
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Newtons, Einsteins and Hawkings
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: relativitybeyondeinstein
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Newtons, Einsteins and Hawkings
  • From: relativitybeyondeinstein
• Re: Androcles, see some tight code.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin clock problem - SR experts help!
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: O'Barr: Our reality!
  • From: vanep
• What a story !
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Androcles, see some tight code.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: wespe
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Wilsonian (true, lightless) Relativity....Wilson's Paradox.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: jem
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: jem
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: jem
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: YBM
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: bz
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: bz
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: MP
• Re: why lorentz transformation?
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: wespe
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Speed Of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: TOM ROBERTS OBSERVES ACCRETION DISC AROUND BLACK HOLE - SPOG
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Wilsonian (true, lightless) Relativity....Wilson's Paradox.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Androcles, see some tight code.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Androcles, see some tight code.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Androcles, see some tight code.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: Bilge
• Re: About Einstein's aether
  • From: Mike
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Androcles, see some tight code.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: MP
• Re: The NuTeV Anomaly May be Evidence of Magnetic Monopoles!
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: O'Barr: Our reality!
  • From: RP
• TOM ROBERTS OBSERVES ACCRETION DISC AROUND BLACK HOLE - SPOG
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: wespe
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: jem
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: jem
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: jem
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: jem
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: O'Barr: Our reality!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Spectrum!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: why lorentz transformation?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler Shift is a measure of the varying speed of light
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's train thought experiment and lightning strike alignment
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: why lorentz transformation?
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The origin of the universe.
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Closing Speed of Light? What about 'Departing Speed'?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: RP
• Re: Shubert's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformations
  • From: RP
• Re: Shubert's Derivatio