Re: why lorentz transformation?


"David McAnally" <D.McAnally@i'm_a_gnu.uq.net.au> wrote in message
news:df7aqf$29bi$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
| >and you have offered nothing
| >*demonstrable*.
|
| I shouldn't need to demonstrate the fact that Maxwell's Equations
predict
| the existence of radiation. The fact is very well documented, and has
| been known since the nineteenth century. If, in the twenty-first
century,
| this fact, which has been known for well over 100 years, escapes you,
then
| that says more about your incompetence than it says about Maxwell's
| Equations.
|
| I will give a small part of the derivation, although, with your level
of
| competence, I have no doubt that it will be a waste of time to explain
it
| to you.
|
| In vacuo, and in the absence of sources, Maxwell's Equations reduce to
|
| @E_x/@x + @E_y/@y + @E_z/@z = 0,
|
| @B_z/@y - @B_y/@z = (1/c^2) @E_x/@t,
WRONG!
| @B_x/@z - @B_z/@x = (1/c^2) @E_y/@t,
WRONG!
| @B_y/@x - @B_x/@y = (1/c^2) @E_z/@t,

WRONG!

| @B_x/@x + @B_y/@y + @B_z/@z = 0,
|
| @E_z/@y - @E_y/@z = - @B_x/@t,
|
| @E_x/@z - @E_z/@x = - @B_y/@t,
|
| @E_y/@x - @E_x/@y = - @B_z/@t,
|
| where E_x is the x-component of the electric field, B_x is the
x-component
| of the magnetic field, etc, c is a constant with the dimensions of
speed
| (with known value 299 792 458 m s^{-1}), and for any field f, @f/@x
| denotes the derivative of f with respect to x, etc.

You can stop right there, Sue don't like ASCII math, there is no such
animal as "dimensions of speed" and Maxwell's equations we built for
the aether Maxwell believed in. We got rid of that with MMX,
and: "It is known that Maxwell's electrodynamics--as usually understood
at the present time--when applied to moving bodies, leads to asymmetries
which do not appear to be inherent in the phenomena." - Einstein.
Ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

Ir was KNOWN to be WRONG a hundred years ago, and you are still touting
it as if it were right.
With your level of INcompetence, I have no doubt that it will be a waste
of time to explain it to you, phuckwit!
Androcles.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A question on electric fielt.
    ... I vaguely remember once calculating the field of a uniformly charged line in two dimensions; probably one could use that result to obtain the field of a disk in three dimensions. ... It seems to me that it is quite difficult to sketch the pattern of electric field lines for disk as they will not be uniform. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Too tiny previews in filters (eg. iwarp)
    ... sliders an some buttons waste huge space on the rest ... Because the preview applies the filter to a small part of the image and so runs much faster (64x faster, if you reduce dimensions to 1/8 of the ...
    (comp.graphics.apps.gimp)