Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: "Spoonfed" <jonathan.doolin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Sep 2005 14:19:27 -0700
russ...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> Kim B wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > If you choose a point on the rod a use its current speed as your FOR,
> > the the rest of the rod will fit nicely in this FOR (along the FOR's
> > line of simultaneity) ... with the same speed all along and the
> > correct proper length, exactly as it fits in our "rest" frame at the
> > base line ... all frames are equal, assuming the rod has accelerated
> > and will accelerate forever.
>
> Thanks. Of course you are quite right about that, and I
> apologize for my many mistakes here.
I believe it when I hear it, but it's a little tricky to figure out.
It seems surprising that no matter what reference frame you are in, all
parts of the rod will pass v=0 at the same time. I'm not in the mood
to develop a proof, but it seems right.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: russell
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: Kim B
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- References:
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: russell
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: Spoonfed
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: russell
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: Spoonfed
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: Kim B
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: Spoonfed
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: russell
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: russell
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: Kim B
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: russell
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Why a Problem?
- Next by Date: johnreed take 6.1
- Previous by thread: Re: Rigid rod problem
- Next by thread: Re: Rigid rod problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|