Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: russell@xxxxxxxx
- Date: 6 Sep 2005 13:41:41 -0700
Kim B wrote:
[snip]
> If you choose a point on the rod a use its current speed as your FOR,
> the the rest of the rod will fit nicely in this FOR (along the FOR's
> line of simultaneity) ... with the same speed all along and the
> correct proper length, exactly as it fits in our "rest" frame at the
> base line ... all frames are equal, assuming the rod has accelerated
> and will accelerate forever.
Thanks. Of course you are quite right about that, and I
apologize for my many mistakes here.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: Spoonfed
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- References:
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: russell
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: Spoonfed
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: russell
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: Spoonfed
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: Kim B
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: Spoonfed
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: russell
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: russell
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- From: Kim B
- Re: Rigid rod problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Mathematical Inconsistencies in Einstein's Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation
- Next by Date: Re: Yet another twin paradox explanation
- Previous by thread: Re: Rigid rod problem
- Next by thread: Re: Rigid rod problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|