Re: Why a Problem?

Bilge wrote:
> Perspicacious:
> > "We present in this paper a derivation of the Lorentz
> > transformation by invoking the principle of relativity
> > alone, without resorting to the a priori assumption of
> > the existence of a universal limiting velocity. Such a
> > velocity is shown to be a necessary consequence of the
> > first postulate, and the fact that it is not infinite
> > is borne out by experiment."
>
> No one is arguing that it can't. You can go back over my
> posts as far as you like and see that Ive pointed that out.
> It's your own idea of how to do that which is being criticized.

The most frequently repeated criticisms have been answered.
It is a matter of record in the google archives that the rebuttal
is so perfectly irrefutable that it has turned one seemingly
knowledgeable physicist into an ugly, uncontrollably vicious,
permanently irrational troll. It's all documented here:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/96abd3c572a0082b
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/8006baf1a1b23133

.

Quantcast