Re: Roberts the "physicist".
- From: "Martin Hogbin" <goatREMOVETHIS123@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 08:22:58 +0000 (UTC)
"Igor" <thoovler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1126218428.109249.203910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> <snip all the nonsense>
>
> And just what leads you to believe that the speed of light has to be
> different in opposite directions in empty space? What is causing this?
> Last time I checked, Maxwell's equations were invariant under
> reflections. Oh, I forgot. You think Maxwell was wrong too. But you
> don't believe in an aether either. This is a very curious situation.
> Maybe if you laid out your fundamental assumptions for all to see, your
> position would be more clearly understood. Stop dwelling on an almost
> trivial point in Einstein's original paper and say what you actually
> mean.
No chance. None of the crackpots on this group has ever been
able to do this.
Martin Hogbin
.
- References:
- Roberts the "physicist".
- From: Androcles
- Re: Roberts the "physicist".
- From: Igor
- Roberts the "physicist".
- Prev by Date: Re: What if there is a single lightning strike at midpoint M?
- Next by Date: Re: The true crackpots
- Previous by thread: Re: Roberts the "physicist".
- Next by thread: Re: Can a black hole feed more than once?!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|