Re: why lorentz transformation?
- From: D.McAnally@i'm_a_gnu.uq.net.au (David McAnally)
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:15:29 +0000 (UTC)
After Androcles' latest posting, I see that he is still indulging in
behaviour more uncivil and more disgusting than the behaviour for which
he falsely claimed to have kill-filed me. This reinforces the point that
I have already made that Androcles is a hypocrite. His response also
reinforces the fact that he is nothing but a liar, since he claimed to
have kill-filed me when he obviously didn't.
I will leave a comment on the intellectual handicap under which Androcles
is working, and the intellectual wasteland of his arguments to a time when
I have more time at my disposal.
I merely content myself with pointing out that Androcles is both a proven
liar and a hypocrite. Obviously integrity means nothing to him.
Also, I would again urge Androcles to read
www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf as it is really most apposite
to him and his level of understanding of mathematics and physics.
-----
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why lorentz transformation?
- From: Androcles
- Re: why lorentz transformation?
- References:
- why lorentz transformation?
- From: francisco
- Re: why lorentz transformation?
- From: Sue...
- Re: why lorentz transformation?
- From: David McAnally
- Re: why lorentz transformation?
- From: Sue...
- Re: why lorentz transformation?
- From: David McAnally
- Re: why lorentz transformation?
- From: Sue...
- Re: why lorentz transformation?
- From: David McAnally
- Re: why lorentz transformation?
- From: Androcles
- Re: why lorentz transformation?
- From: David McAnally
- Re: why lorentz transformation?
- From: Androcles
- why lorentz transformation?
- Prev by Date: Re: why lorentz transformation?
- Next by Date: Re: What if there is a single lightning strike at midpoint M?
- Previous by thread: Re: why lorentz transformation?
- Next by thread: Re: why lorentz transformation?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|