Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons
- From: "Dr Photon" <brendan.roycroft@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Sep 2005 01:17:52 -0700
Steve Carlip wrote:
>Not the main point -- but if you treat the mass, charge, and angular
>momentum of an electron classically, you don't get a Kerr-Newman black
>hole, but a naked singularity. There are limits on the charge-to-mass
>ratio and the angular momentum-to-mass ratio for a black hole, and
>an electron far exceeds both.
yes, I even started a thread about that about a month ago.
What also interested me is that if you take an uncharged black hole,
add an electron to it, the event horizon shrinks.
br
.
- References:
- Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons
- From: carlip-nospam
- Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons
- Prev by Date: Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
- Next by Date: Re: why lorentz transformation?
- Previous by thread: Re: Kerr-Newman metric and entangled electrons
- Next by thread: Re: On light aberration
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|