Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.


"Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dh6s7o$icq$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Henri Wilson wrote:
| > You people just don't (can't) get it do you.
| >
| > What astronomers are observing is the result of the BaT.
| > It is being wrongly interpreted on the basis of Einsteiniana.
| >
| > When an object is classed as a 'contact binary with period 0.4
days', in actual
| > fact, it might not be anything of the kind.
|
| Examples of such stars:
| http://www.astro.utoronto.ca/DDO/research/binaries_prog.html

That's not an observation of a star, that's an observation of a
distortion.
You are too stupid to understand straight sticks in water are not really
bent.
You think it is blatantly obvious they are, you can see it.
Contact binaries and Roche limits don't mix too well, Roche wins every
time.
We both know you are stupid enought to argue in favour of Roche
when it suits you and ignore him when you when you want a contact
binary.


|
| > It is really a star or binary pair orbiting with a much slower
period. We are
| > positioned so that we see multiple images, each of which comes and
goes every
| > 0.4 days.
|
| Strange how it is possible to measure the radial velocity
| of those multiple images coming and going all the time, isn't it? :-)

Not really, my computer program predicts it. Henri's doesn't, but
he isn't a scientist. Nor are you, so we have two idiots arguing
about something they know nothing about. Henri is closer to the
truth that you, but he doesn't know how to program an ellipse.
He thinks he can keep the same shape and move the focus where
he likes, the halfwit.

| > This is typical of the way in which the whole of astronomy has been
led up the
| > wrong path by Einstein.
|
| Sure, Henri.
| You are obviously right. :-)

Henri isn't right, he's just closer to the truth than you will ever be.
Henri is a halfwit, smarter than a dimwit, better than a nitwit. You
are a phuckwit.
Androcles.






.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OK
    ... But even if the distance was for another star ... you was still able to get the light curve of A Aur "right", ... >>And the ballistic theory predicts that telescopes doesn't ... >>Cant you still not see them puffing in and out, Henri? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: OK
    ... > precisely constant periods that are observed in relation to variable star ... Ask Paul Andersen!" ... Sure, Henri. ... I think you would find that these interference fringes are ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
    ... Henri, Henri, Henri! ... Our ears sensitivity to frequency can loosely be said to be logarithmic. ... But the statement "frequency is logarithmic" is meaningless. ... many star appear to be a lot closer than they are. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
    ... Henri, you really ought to familiarize yourself with the extensive ... In the X-ray region of the spectrum, ... It looks like a star, quacks like a star, waddles like a star... ... Unification is NOT like extinction. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
    ... |>Henri, Henri, Henri! ... |>Our ears sensitivity to frequency can loosely be said to be logarithmic. ... |>But the statement "frequency is logarithmic" is meaningless. ... ...and the real reason for my variable star 'distance ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)