Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?


Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
> "Daniel Weston" <daniel009@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:29512-4338462A-1217@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > I am sure that this is a naive question, but I would like it to be
> > clarified in my own mind. Take a laboratory as a FOR. Does movement
> > within the lab destroy the lab as a FOR?

Dirt can also answer all the questions you have about the square root.
hahahhahahahah

Mike

> No.

yes dip***, imbecile, idiot, crackpot Dirt of the Motel, it can
destroy the FOR you want, depending on what FOR you want it to be and
at what measurement precision you are looking for, stupid.

For instance idiot Dirt, if you are looking for an inertial frame of
reference but your motion is such that it couples to the laboratory
frame other forces that cause local accelerations then you cannot apply
Newton's 2nd law and make measurements in that frame unless you can
account for those forces with high precision. Thus, the question asked
is a good one and can only be answered in the context of the particular
frame and motions of observers.

idiot Dirt, it is obvious you have never taken a single measurement in
your life, just expert in copy and paste.

Mike





>
> > If a scientist changes
> > position from one end of the lab to the other, is the scientist in the
> > lab's FOR during this travel?
>
> Of course.
> "Being at rest in a FOR" and "being in motion in a FOR" are
> meaningful concepts, but just "being in a FOR" is meaningless.
>
> > Does the lab cease to consist of 1 FOR
> > upon internal motion?
>
> No.
> But the scientist can decide to have his own frame of reference.
> The lab remains a frame of reference as long as someone contemplates
> times and locations of events with respect to the lab frame.
>
> > If motion within the lab destroys the lab and its
> > contents from being in the same FOR, does this mean that a moving
> > experiment cannot be done within a single FOR?
>
> Motion within the lab does not destroy the lab.
>
> >
> > Depending on the answer I have some follow up questions.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> blank lines?
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> more blank lines?
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> and more blank lines?
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Why all these blank lines at the end of every post you make?
>
> Dirk Vdm

.