Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
- From: "sue jahn" <suzysewnshow>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:29:55 -0400
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:55:46 -0400, Androcles MyPlace.org> <<Androcles> wrote:
"sue jahn" <suzysewnshow> wrote in message news:op.sxrxo8v81v3b7x@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 04:19:24 -0400, Androcles MyPlace.org> <<Androcles> | wrote: | | > Hmm... this clock depends on motion and the local speed of light being | > fairly constant or it won't work at all. | > http://www.amherst.edu/~ermace/sth/birdseye.jpeg | | That is because they didn't have railroads when it | was built. ;-) | | Sue... You think we hauled those 50 ton rocks 18 miles on the A344 through Devizes with an 18-wheeler Mack truck, eh?
LOL I tho't o' that after clicking the send button and seem to recall read 'bout the some of the transport problems that construction involved.
http://www.multimap.com/map/browse.cgi?client=public&X=412000&Y=142250&width=500&height=300&gride=&gridn=&srec=0&coordsys=gb&db=freegaz&addr1=&addr2=&addr3=&pc=&advanced=&local=&localinfosel=&kw=&inmap=&table=&ovtype=&zm=1&scale=25000
Lemme tell ya summat. The A344 has construction all the way along it. ALL British roads have construction on them, ALL the time. American roads are the same.
Dr Beeching came and took out the tracks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beeching_axe "The Beeching Axe was a reaction to the failed railway modernisation plan of the 1950s, which spent huge amounts of money on buying new equipment such as new diesel and electric locomotives without first examining the railways' role, what was actually going to be needed, or the implications of changing old-fashioned working practices and tackling the problem of chronic overmanning."
We had to find employment for the railway workers and got them digging up the roads. That clock was built before 1950, y'know, but it lasted so long we decided no new diesel and electric locomotives were needed to build another.
The only reason some stones fell over was someone turning it twice a year through 30 degrees to keep it on daylight saving time.
LOL... The left would claim that created jobs for two more days and the right would claim two more days work were extracted from the workers. Who could argue ? ;-)
Of COURSE we had rail, we've always had rail. I know cos my dad, my grandad and my great-grandad were railwaymen, and I'm older'n dirt. Even Einstein did his experiments on a choo-choo, and so did Doppler. "Didn't have railroads when it was built" --- Phooooo-ee! :-)
Well..... Maybe they didn't have lightning stokes. :o)
Sue...
Androcles.
-- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
- From: Androcles
- Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
- References:
- Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
- From: Androcles
- Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
- Prev by Date: Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
- Next by Date: Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
- Previous by thread: Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
- Next by thread: Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
- Index(es):