Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.


"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:7nhu03-apb.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| In sci.physics.relativity, Androcles
| <Androcles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote
| on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:04:54 GMT
| <qVW_e.10785$VI6.10559@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| >
| > "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
| > message news:k79t03-fu7.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | In sci.physics.relativity, H@..(Henri Wilson)
| > | <H@>
| > | wrote
| > | on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:57:31 GMT
| > | <ejanj196tr4ugq38o1m2o4fe02cl2pvaqs@xxxxxxx>:
| >
| > | > But in reality they don't...do they Ghost.
| > |
| > | Hard to say. I'd have to study the data from Algol and
| > | Delta Cephei. The prevailing view, which is highly corrupt
| > | according to Androcles (Einstein was a very successful
| > | huckster, apparently, backed up by quite a number of
| > | experiments, de Sitter, Michelson-Morley,
| >
| > WHOA! Don't Michelson in as a supporter of Einstein.
| > Michelson kill-filed Einstein.
| > Morley was a chemist along for the ride, he didn't care either.
|
| Presumably both Michelson and Morely, along with Einstein,
| are now dead.

I did use the past tense. Einstein WAS a very successful
huckster. There is nothing apparent about it, it's historical fact.
You can claim insanity for Einstein as a defense, but the death
of physics throughout the 20th century will be remembered,
it's phoenix-like revival in the 21st brought about by the sanity
of the resurrected Newton.
|
| >
| > and others among
| > | them), is that Algol is about 92 light years away and
| > | Delta Cephei is a star which plays "balloon..collapse..
| > | balloon..collapse" with a period of about 5 1/2 days, with
| > | a number of characteristics including temperature/general
| > | luminosity shifts.
| > |
| > Don't forget:
| > Algol is an eclipsing binary,
|
| Unproven.

GIVE ME A FUCKING CHANCE TO FINISH A PARAGRAPH BEFORE YOU *** IN, WILL
YA?
YOU ARE AS IMPETUOUS AS SUE.

Bear in mind that SR of course has not been proven either,
| but given the assumptions therein, Algol does eclipse. However,
| within BaT, I don't know if Henry has stated such.
|
| > "But the two stars
|
| Three. The third star is very small and is between the two.
BOLLOCKS! I'm quoting Andersen!

|
| > of Algol have different mass, radius and
| > density, and the B8 is well outside of the Roche limit
| > of the K2, while the K2 is just at the Roche limit of the B8.
| > That is, the K2 fills its Roche lobe completely, and mass
| > is transferred to the B8. So the K2 IS torn apart and there
| > is an accretion disk around the B8 akin to the rings of Saturn.
| > (This accretion disk is not stable, though. It is a transient
| > disk; the mass transferred from the K2 bounces off the surface
| > of the B8 and eventually falls back to the surface.) "
|
| Again, this is unproven. Well-founded, perhaps, given what
| we think we know, but unproven.

IT'S A LOAD OF CRAP ANDERSEN WROTE.
|
| > Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
| > From: "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.ander...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -
Find
| > messages by this author
| > Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:00:34 +0200
| > Local: Wed, Sep 14 2005 1:00 pm
| > Subject: Re: Spectrum!
| >
| >
| > Being a B8, the "surface" that the unstable accretion disk bounces
off
| > looks like this:
| > http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshots/2003_11_04/c2w.gif
| > only a little stronger.
| > I do like that, definitely a keeper.
| >
| > Better yet, the K2 is a Wilson Cool Heavy, floating in fairy dust.
| > ROFLMAO!
|
| Replace it with 10 planets, period 53.7 Earth days each. That should
| work reasonably well.
|
| If you don't like that try 100 with period 537.
|
| Hmm...I may have to update my simulator to handle multiple bodies.
This
| could get slightly messy.
|
| >
| > Androcles.
| >
|
| --
| #191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
| It's still legal to go .sigless.

.