sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Sthgir
• Re: On the Energy of "Superluminal" muons
  • From: Bilge
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: PD
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: failure of Michelson-Morley?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: a question about conservation and photons
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How do you Interpret the Lorentz transform
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a question about conservation and photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: CFran
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: CFran
• Re: Matrix Mass
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: a question about conservation and photons
  • From: bz
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: how to understand a tensor
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a question about conservation and photons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: failure of Michelson-Morley?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: CATHARTIC DIGITAL DISLOCATION REINTEGRATIVE FETISH
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: a question about conservation and photons
  • From: bz
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: CFran
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: CFran
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: a question about conservation and photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: TomGee
• Re: a question about conservation and photons
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: failure of Michelson-Morley?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: Hayek
• Re: How do you Interpret the Lorentz transform
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How do you Interpret the Lorentz transform
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How do you Interpret the Lorentz transform
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a question about conservation and photons
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: CFran
• Re: How do you Interpret the Lorentz transform
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: PD
• Re: Matrix Mass
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: Androcles
• Re: failure of Michelson-Morley?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: failure of Michelson-Morley?
  • From: King Coffee
• Re: How do you Interpret the Lorentz transform
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: CFran
• Re: Incoherence of relativistic dynamics
  • From: Androcles
• Welcome to sci.physics.relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Matrix Mass
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Matrix Mass
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Matrix Mass
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: failure of Michelson-Morley?
  • From: King Coffee
• Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: xxein
• Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: failure of Michelson-Morley?
  • From: Sue...
• Time dilatation and a space referential
  • From: CFran
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: failure of Michelson-Morley?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: Sue...
• Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: failure of Michelson-Morley?
  • From: Monist__
• Re: Heisenburg's Uncertainty Principle & Pelton Wheel Design
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• failure of Michelson-Morley?
  • From: King Coffee
• Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance
  • From: stephen
• Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: PD
• Re: Heisenburg's Uncertainty Principle & Pelton Wheel Design
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Matrix Mass
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Heisenburg's Uncertainty Principle & Pelton Wheel Design
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Matrix Mass
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: PD
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: bz
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: PD
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: PD
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: bz
• A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: bz
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Science forum
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Alka
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: deterministic truth, deterministic falsehood
  • From: Burgerman
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Bilge
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Bilge
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: force
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Bilge
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Science forum
  • From: Harry
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Peri of Pera
• force
  • From: significant zero
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: stephen
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: stephen
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: stephen
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: rryker1
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: stephen
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: PD
• Re: johnreed take 18
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Van Moortel thinks stalking me is gonna get rid of me.......
  • From: cadwgan_gedrych
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: astronomic radiotelescope array synch
  • From: beda pietanza
• Van Moortel thinks stalking me is gonna get rid of me.......
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: bitter, pathetic, old man
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: The Speed of Light is Constant by Defintion
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Van Moortel, the bitter, pathetic old man
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: PD
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why doesn't light go into the nucleus?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Harry
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Harry
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: shuba
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: johnreed take 18
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: deterministic truth, deterministic falsehood
  • From: Burgerman
• Re: need help on Gravitational waves
  • From: Androcles
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: astronomic radiotelescope array synch
  • From: Sue...
• Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity
  • From: beda pietanza
• astronomic radiotelescope array synch
  • From: beda pietanza
• deterministic truth, deterministic falsehood
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: johnreed take 18
  • From: randamajor
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: dishington
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: johnreed take 19
  • From: randamajor
• Re: johnreed take 19
  • From: randamajor
• Re: need help on Gravitational waves
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: need help on Gravitational waves
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: equation of motion for a perfect fluid
  • From: principalbundles
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: vern
• Re: Paradox of Zeno.
  • From: penguinista
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• need help on Gravitational waves
  • From: machu france
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The Speed of Light is Constant by Defintion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Harry
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: bz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The shape of an electron in motion
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Speed of Light is Constant by Defintion
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Heisenburg's Uncertainty Principle & Pelton Wheel Design
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Heisenburg's Uncertainty Principle & Pelton Wheel Design
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Source for Einstein Quotes
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: bz
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Heisenburg's Uncertainty Principle & Pelton Wheel Design
  • From: Rob_Exeter
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Source for Einstein Quotes
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Source for Einstein Quotes
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: sue jahn
• The Cat is out of the bag
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Source for Einstein Quotes
  • From: Steve Kranst
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Speed of Light is Constant by Defintion
  • From: shuba
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: black hole question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: MP
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Gravity's equal and non equal acceleration
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Einsteinians Don't Love Einstein's Second Postulate Anymore?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• equation of motion for a perfect fluid
  • From: principalbundles
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: rryker1
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: rryker1
• Re: Beginning of a light wave
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einsteinians Don't Love Einstein's Second Postulate Anymore?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: black hole question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: bz
• Re: to the sci-physics people
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Bilge
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einsteinians Don't Love Einstein's Second Postulate Anymore?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Bilge
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: xxein
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Bilge
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: xxein
• Re: Einsteinians Don't Love Einstein's Second Postulate Anymore?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Androcles
• Two-way speed of light (TWLS)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einsteinians Don't Love Einstein's Second Postulate Anymore?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (ctd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: androc1es
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (contd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: black hole question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (contd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (contd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: black hole question
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (contd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: sue jahn
• black hole question
  • From: special
• to the sci-physics people
  • From: special
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: What is it about matter that slows light?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Really Big Bang??
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: bz
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: stephen
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Really Big Bang??
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (ctd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Really Big Bang??
  • From: ianparker2
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: HOLY SMOKE!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (ctd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (ctd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (ctd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: PD
• Re: HOLY SMOKE!!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Areader
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (ctd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Harry
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: HOLY SMOKE!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: HOLY SMOKE!!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Twin Idiocy Again
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (ctd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's Twin Idiocy Again
  • From: bz
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (ctd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Einstein's Twin Idiocy Again
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (ctd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (ctd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Einstein's Twin Idiocy Again
  • From: bz
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: bz
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (ctd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Harry
• Re: How is Antimatter created in A paticle accelerator
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: In the Beginning
  • From: Jack
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: bz
• Re: Urgent mass matter.!!
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: BILGE the BILGE!
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: PD
• Re: Urgent mass matter.!!
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The shape of an electron in motion
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Urgent mass matter.!!
  • From: PD
• Re: Urgent mass matter.!!
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: PD
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein's Twin Idiocy Again
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's Twin Idiocy Again
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Einstein's Twin Idiocy Again
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Beginning of a light wave
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• One of the biggest mistakes
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Beginning of a light wave
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Beginning of a light wave
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: Sue...
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Beginning of a light wave
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Einstein, Popper and Thought Experiments
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (ctd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (ctd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (contd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: bz
• Re: The shape of an electron in motion
  • From: Bilge
• Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (ctd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Derivation of Lorentz Transformation (contd. from sci.physics.research)
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Paradox of Zeno.
  • From: Richard Gauthier
• Re: The shape of an electron in motion
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: wespe
• Re: How is Antimatter created in A paticle accelerator
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The shape of an electron in motion
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: The shape of an electron in motion
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: sci.physics.relativity.crap
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: wespe
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: PD
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: Androcles
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Beginning of a light wave
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Beginning of a light wave
  • From: Sue...
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Beginning of a light wave
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Dennis
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Almost right.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Marcello the obsessed imbecile.
  • From: Marcello
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: The shape of an electron in motion
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: John Kennaugh
• OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Kim B
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: the absolute content of an apple
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: the absolute content of an apple
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: the absolute content of an apple
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Kim B
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: Marcello
• Tom Robert's forces
  • From: Androcles
• Re: sci.physics.relativity.crap
  • From: Androcles
• Re: sci.physics.relativity.crap
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: PD
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: bz
• Re: sci.physics.relativity.crap
  • From: Androcles
• Re: no reason to Read alt.local.village.idiot,alt.morons,
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The shape of an electron in motion
  • From: DarkD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: How is Antimatter created in A paticle accelerator
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The shape of an electron in motion
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Bill Rowe
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Welcome to sci.physics.relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: bz
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: androc1es
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: bz
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Sue...
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: When does a FOR cease to be a FOR?
  • From: Marcello
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: androc1es
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: androc1es
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Dennis
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Sue...
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Dennis
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: PD
• Re: Urgent mass matter.!!
  • From: PD
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Androcles
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE Curvature of Space
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: The shape of an electron in motion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Androcles
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: Androcles
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The shape of an electron in motion
  • From: DarkD
• Re: How is Antimatter created in A paticle accelerator
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Areader
• Re: The shape of an electron in motion
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The shape of an electron in motion
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Urgent mass matter.!!
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Urgent mass matter.!!
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Almost right.
  • From: Androcles
• The Grand Constancy of Light Illusion
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Androcles in his Red Camaro
  • From: androc1es
• Re: johnreed take 19
  • From: Androcles
• Re: johnreed take 18
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: In the Beginning
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: johnreed take 19
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• johnreed take 19
  • From: randamajor
• johnreed take 18
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Speed
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the absolute content of an apple
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Dennis
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How is Antimatter created in A paticle accelerator
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: the absolute content of an apple
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Urgent mass matter.!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Orex
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How is Antimatter created in A paticle accelerator
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: the absolute content of an apple
  • From: PD
• Re: The Speed of Light is Constant by Defintion
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: vern
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: xxein
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Bilge
• Re: wrong claims
  • From: xxein
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Almost right.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE Curvature of Space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: wrong claims
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: PD
• Re: the absolute content of an apple
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: wrong claims
  • From: Sue...
• Re: c is time dependent !
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How is Antimatter created in A paticle accelerator
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Pioneer 10: two solutions redshift or blueshift
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: Androcles
• the absolute content of an apple
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Pioneer 10: two solutions redshift or blueshift
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Bob
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• illusion de la matière
  • From: louis . sricher
• Re: How is Antimatter created in A paticle accelerator
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Electron at rest is a magnetic field
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: THE Curvature of Space
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: wrong claims
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How is Antimatter created in A paticle accelerator
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: wrong claims
  • From: xxein
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: PD
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: xxein
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Simple gravity questions (hopefully)
  • From: Bob
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Speed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: THE Curvature of Space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE Curvature of Space
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: How is Antimatter created in A paticle accelerator
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE Curvature of Space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gravitational redshift.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE Curvature of Space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• THE Curvature of Space
  • From: FallingSpace
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How is Antimatter created in A paticle accelerator
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Dennis
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• New Physics Theory
  • From: Don
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How is Antimatter created in A paticle accelerator
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: How is Antimatter created in A paticle accelerator
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How is Antimatter created in A paticle accelerator
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: note to AI.1
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: note to AI.1
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: note to AI.1
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Electron at rest is a magnetic field
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Gravitational redshift.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Speed
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravitational redshift.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Speed
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: New Paradoxes in Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Speed
  • From: Toad
• Re: Speed
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Speed
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed
  • From: Toad
• Re: Speed
  • From: PD
• Speed
  • From: Paddan
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Erom
• Re: New Paradoxes in Relativity
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: vern
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Andersen, the lying tusselad's picture.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Andersen, the lying tusselad.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: note to AI.1
  • From: tron
• note to AI.1
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: wrong claims
  • From: Androcles
• Re: test
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: wrong claims
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: test
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Electron at rest is a magnetic field
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: wrong claims
  • From: xxein
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Electron at rest is a magnetic field
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: PD
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: PD
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: In the Beginning
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• test
  • From: Significant zero
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Androcles
• Re: In the Beginning
  • From: Jack
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tusselad's diffraction.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tusselad's diffraction.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quick Cash in Weeks!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Bilge
• Re: NASA'S GRAVITY PROBE B MISSION COMPLETES DATA COLLECTION
  • From: em
• Re: Electron at rest is a magnetic field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: In the Beginning
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Electron at rest is a magnetic field
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: New Paradoxes in Relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Tusselad's diffraction.
  • From: Androcles
• New Paradoxes in Relativity
  • From: SSBrown
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Electron at rest is a magnetic field
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: johnreed take 1A - 2005
  • From: randamajor
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electron at rest is a magnetic field
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: PD
• Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: In the Beginning
  • From: TomGee
• Re: In the Beginning
  • From: TomGee
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Newbie : the veritable nature of fields.
  • From: salvatore
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Electron at rest is a magnetic field
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Areader
• Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electron at rest is a magnetic field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Force between 2 charged particles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Andersen, the lying tusselad.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravitational redshift.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravitational redshift.
  • From: dwhig265
• Dark matter does not exist - Einstein wins again!
  • From: Areader
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: vern
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Billy Bob
• Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Newbie Question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: shuba
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: carlip-nospam
• MMX Expected Shft.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Attention golf-NUTs.!! $600 pou. 1 bright fresh 2-bdrm apt, with fridge stove & balcony included. Partly furnished. Quiet monor.!!
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Newbie Question
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Hanging Phuckwit Duck
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Newbie Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: relation between ecc and contact resistance
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Newbie Question
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Newbie Question
  • From: salvatore
• Re: Hanging Phuckwit Duck
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Hanging Phuckwit Duck
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: bz
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
  • From: shuba
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: PD
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: PD
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
  • From: Harry
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?
  • From: vern
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• More details about the at theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Tom's doubt (..wasTomTom's stupidity)
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: bz
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: PD
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Will Kramer
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
  • From: shuba
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Gnah
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: bz
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Simple Experiment To Prove the Ether
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Force between 2 charged particles
  • From: RP
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravitational redshift.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: bz
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Androcles
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gravitational redshift.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Sue...
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
  • From: shuba
• Re: Gravitational redshift.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: bz
• Re: Simple Experiment To Prove the Ether
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Simple Experiment To Prove the Ether
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Gnah
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Gravitational redshift.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Sue...
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: César Sirvent
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: César Sirvent
• Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: The at theory - 07Sep05 (Second try).
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Uncaused First Cause
  • From: Bill Hobba
• The at theory - 07Sep05.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: johnreed take 1A - 2005
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gravitational redshift.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Gravitational redshift.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Making Maxwell radiate
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: xxein
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: xxein
• Re: johnreed take 1A - 2005
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: physical sources, physical observers, physical spaces
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bielawski agrees with Androcles for a change.
  • From: PD
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: PD
• Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Making Maxwell radiate
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Force between 2 charged particles
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bielawski agrees with Androcles for a change.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Bielawski agrees with Androcles for a change.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Making Maxwell radiate
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Force between 2 charged particles
  • From: sal
• johnreed take 1A - 2005
  • From: randamajor
• Re: The porthole view during acceleration is purely weird.
  • From: sal
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: bz
• Re: Force between 2 charged particles
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The porthole view during acceleration is purely weird.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Force between 2 charged particles
  • From: sal
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Burgerman
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: PD
• The porthole view during acceleration is purely weird.
  • From: sal
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Making Maxwell radiate
  • From: Androcles
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Simple Experiment To Prove the Ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple Experiment To Prove the Ether
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• relation between ecc and contact resistance
  • From: Biradar L S
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Simple Experiment To Prove the Ether
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
  • From: shuba
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Force between 2 charged particles
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: xxein
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: xxein
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Force between 2 charged particles
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: PD
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Russell
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Russell
• Re: Force between 2 charged particles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Force between 2 charged particles
  • From: Harry
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Russell
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: NASA'S GRAVITY PROBE B MISSION COMPLETES DATA COLLECTION
  • From: Sue...
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Russell
• Re: Bile-wacky the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Gnah
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: NASA'S GRAVITY PROBE B MISSION COMPLETES DATA COLLECTION
  • From: em
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Force between 2 charged particles
  • From: Julian Becker
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hi 'n bye!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Hi 'n bye!
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Force between 2 charged particles
  • From: Julian Becker
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: The Uncaused First Cause
  • From: Bilge
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: PD
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: PD
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: PD
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Paradox of Zeno.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Bile-wacky the Janitor.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: shevek
• Re: The Uncaused First Cause
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Bile-wacky the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Bile-wacky the Janitor.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: PD
• Re: GOD=G_uv IS XTIANITY A HUMAN SACRIFICE RELIGION ?
  • From: Burgerman
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Hi 'n bye!
  • From: DavidBowman
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?
  • From: vern
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Kim B
• Re: GOD=G_uv IS XTIANITY A HUMAN SACRIFICE RELIGION ?
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Jerry
• Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Sknil
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: PD
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bile-wacky the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Paradox of Zeno.
  • From: wespe
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Paradox of Zeno.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Androcles
• Roberts' stupidity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: LET’S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN’S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: xxein
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Electro-London Inertia
  • From: xxein
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Schoenfeld's stupidity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Uncaused First Cause
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Roberts' observation (was Schoenfeld's stupidiity)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Schoenfeld's stupidity (was: Baez's stupidity.)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: PD
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Uncaused First Cause
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GOD=G_uv IS XTIANITY A HUMAN SACRIFICE RELIGION ?
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Correction in "Sal the crackpot"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Logical inconsistency in Lorentz's theory
  • From: Harry
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Baez's stupidity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Bile awski the Janitor.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: PD
• Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• LET’S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN’S ASSUMPTIONS
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: PD
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can current theory _explain_ the twin paradox?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Gravitational redshift...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: basic manifold qu.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Uncaused First Cause
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: The Uncaused First Cause
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: The Uncaused First Cause
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Uncaused First Cause
  • From: Albert Grennock
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Uncaused First Cause
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Uncaused First Cause
  • From: xxein
• Re: Sal the crackpot
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Sue...
• Introduction to Variational principle
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravitational redshift...
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: bz
• Re: Gravitational redshift...
  • From: Sue...
• basic manifold qu.
  • From: jack
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Gravitational redshift...
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Gravitational redshift...
  • From: Hayek
• The Uncaused First Cause
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Kim B
• Re: c is time dependent !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: c is time dependent !
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Gravitational redshift...
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Rod Ryker
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: c is time dependent !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: PD
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: c is time dependent !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• About Wet FiNGER up iNSiDE Michelson Morely wind TEST.!!
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: c is time dependent !
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: c is time dependent !
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Ligo question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The true crackpots
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: c is time dependent !
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why DeSitter was WRONG.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
  • From: PD
• Re: Simulation of gravity using matlab, GR and Quantum Physics
  • From: Androcles
• Simulation of gravity using matlab, GR and Quantum Physics
  • From: Jedi Master
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
  • From: Bill Hobba