Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?

From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 1 Oct 2005 22:03:21 -0700

Rod Ryker wrote:
> Long ago Faraday proved, not caring at the time,
> that electrons at rest have a magnetic field.
> So, why does mainstream physics speak
> with forked tongue?
> --
> Rod Ryker...
> The intricacies of nature is man's cannon fodder.

Did Faraday declare such proof before or after
observing a coupled charge move relativly to the
one *at rest* ? ;-)

http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/~rfitzp/teaching/302l/lectures/node62.html

Sue...

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
  - From: Rod Ryker

Prev by Date: Re: Is Evolution a Law like the 'Laws' of physics?
Next by Date: Re: Nova / Einstein's 100th anniversary show
Previous by thread: About Wet FiNGER up iNSiDE Michelson Morely wind TEST.!!
Next by thread: Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
... > Rod Ryker wrote: ... >> Rod Ryker... ... Electrons not undergoing translational motion still ... A theory (electron spin) that supports your position. ...
(sci.physics.relativity)
Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
... >> Rod Ryker wrote: ... >>> electrons ... >>> as Faraday did, ... >> I can tell you from personal experience that this is false. ...
(sci.physics.relativity)
Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
... >> Rod Ryker wrote: ... >>> electrons ... >>> as Faraday did, ... >> I can tell you from personal experience that this is false. ...
(sci.physics.relativity)