Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior


"Jerry" <Cephalobus_alienus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1128521998.624140.169900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Androcles wrote:
| > "Jerry" <Cephalobus_alienus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:1128495977.675678.20680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | Androcles wrote:
| > |
| > | > Why are you trying to divert attention from the issue?
| > | > You stated "wavelengths _are_ Doppler shifted in the
| > } > real world".
| > | > I've asked you to prove it.
| > |
| > | 1) Spectra from near versus distant galaxies are
| > | differentially shifted by diffraction gratings.
| >
| > A proof of frequency shift when combined with the
| > vector addition of velocities, an axiom.
| > wavecrest count per second = \nu = (c+v)/ \lambda
| > See Doppler.
| >
| >
| > | 2) Traditional theory on diffraction gratings successfully
| > | explains the diffraction angle as a function of wavelength,
| > | incident angle, and grating spacing.
| >
| > Non sequitur, you have not proven a wavelength shift.
| >
| > | 3) Nobody, including Androcles and Henri, has ever offered
| > | an alternative theory of diffraction grating behavior
| > | explaining the diffraction angle as a function of
| > | frequency, velocity of light, incident angle, and grating
| > | spacing as would be required by the ballistic theory.
| >
| > Non sequitur, you didn't ask me, and wouldn't listen anyway.
| >
| >
| > | 4) Until such theory is offered, it must be concluded that
| > | traditional diffraction grating theory is correct.
| >
| > Non sequitur, you have not proven a wavelength shift.
| >
| > | 5) Therefore, all extant theory points to wavelengths
| > | being Doppler shifted in the real world.
| >
| > Non sequitur, you have not proven a wavelength shift.
|
| To Androcles and Henri:
|
| Please present a mathematically consistent model of
| diffraction grating behavior, explaining diffraction
| angle as a function of frequency, velocity of light,
| incident angle, and grating spacing, and which is
| consistent with the ballistic theory.
|
| Jerry

I don't need Henri's collaboration, he's a halfwit promoting
his own pet theory and he's totally irrational.
Exclusive Or (XOR) applies, you'll have to address one or the other,
not both. Try
"To Androcles OR Henri:" then see if the results differ.

Androcles.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Androcles and Henris Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
    ... you have not proven a wavelength shift. ... > | 3) Nobody, including Androcles and Henri, has ever offered ... > | frequency, velocity of light, incident angle, and grating ... > | traditional diffraction grating theory is correct. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Sal the crackpot
    ... | Androcles wrote: ... you have not proven a wavelength shift. ... |> | traditional diffraction grating theory is correct. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
    ... | In sci.physics.relativity, Androcles ... |> | a prism and a diffraction grating to a set of stationary light ... |> and grow weaker and weaker for cooler stars, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms
    ... In sci.physics.relativity, Androcles ... > |> and grow weaker and weaker for cooler stars, ... > |> of the prism and the spacing of the diffraction grating. ... You were asserting that one can change the prism angle and the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Sal the crackpot
    ... | Androcles wrote: ... Which two points does a diffraction grating measure? ... markers on the strip to represent "wavelength" as ... that must falsify emission theory. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading